Not Time Served
A Sea Change in Legal and Medical Education?
show comments
  • Pete

    As for medical schools. If you look at the courses given in undergraduate biology and pre-med programs, you can’t help but notice how far they have advanced from just a generation years. This in-and-of itself is justification for cutting the time to get a MD.

  • Boritz

    Will a PhD ever get below the 8.2 year average? &nbspTalk about degree requirements that could be revisited.

  • Fat_Man

    My father, z’l, and my grandfather, z’l, were lawyers, and both of them had undergraduate law degrees (LL.B.). They both practiced law with great success and much honor in the bar and the community for many years (1921 – 1966 and 1947 – 1990). So it was for hundreds of thousands of lawyers before the organized bar talked the bar examiners into the 7 year requirement. Just remember, Abraham Lincoln did not go to law school. And you, anyone who reads these words, are not a better lawyer than Abraham Lincoln. Really, you aren’t.

    A beginning lawyer needs about 16 semester credits of classroom work. They could be taken as an undergraduate major, or even in community college programs just like training in practical nursing or HVAC repair. This whole business of making law school, a graduate program is ridiculous. After doing the classroom work, a trainee should spend four years under the direct supervision of an experienced lawyer or judge. (sitting in a windowless room doing document review would not count). After a thorough character and fitness review, he could then be sworn in as a member of the Bar.

  • El Gringo

    The apprenticeship would further serve to teach actual lawyering skills. Currently, it is not only possible but normal for students to graduate law school without ever having set foot in a courthouse or learned basic procedures such how to file a legal document.

    We wouldn’t trust a surgeon who has never touched a scalpel but a lawyer who has never actually seen a real legal document seems to be fine?

  • DiaKrieg

    “Most medical schools today take their four-year program from a set of recommendations contained in a report issued in 1910. But the conditions that produced those recommendations were left behind long ago.”

    What conditions are those? Medicine has advanced by orders of magnitude over the past century. Why would it take less time to train a doctor now than it did in 1910, before there were anesthetics or antibiotics, let alone chemotherapy?

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.