CIA Spies on Senate
The Dangers of Obama’s Intel Mismanagement
show comments
  • Kevin

    Well that was brutal.

    • johngbarker

      No, brutal will be another 9/11 caused by failed intelligence.

      • Breif2

        Failed intelligence can be a result of placing excessive restraints on the intelligence services. Failed intelligence can also be a result of intelligence services deciding to play Big Brother instead of focusing on the enemy.

        (I’m inclined to the “With great power comes great responsibility” approach. For example, give great powers to the NSA, but if anyone abuses the trust placed in them, impose truly draconian punishments. Spy on your ex-girlfriend? Mandatory 50 years in jail.)

        • TSIndiana

          Do you really know who “the enemy” is or only who they tell you the enemy is?

      • TSIndiana

        Actually CIA and Mossad were part of 9/11. They needed “provocation” for the 7 country in 5 year “long war” (which is now 10 in 20 and probably WW3). You really think tower 7 fell of it’s own accord when no plane hit it ?

  • Boritz

    “the most important thing is for both parties to think hard about making sure that each nominates presidential
    candidates in 2016 who are ready, willing, and able to give this area the attention it deserves”

    Yes. Both parties should nominate someone who given the opportunity in a game of political brinksmanship to score a really good b**ch slap on the other party by disregarding what’s best for the country would do the right, just, and statesman like thing even if it could be spun to hurt their own party in the next election.

  • TheCynical1

    Whatever the merits of trading liberty for security, I fear we may be trading both away with nothing to show for it.

    • TSIndiana

      Hey, we are paying for Israel to rule the middle east and kill Palestinians. $9,000,000 a day is only the start.

      “Mission accomplished” for Jews, who have no problem with goy blood, leaving destruction behind.

      So three things are accomplished…. 1. Muslims attack Christians and in the aftermath sharia law fills the void, 2. Goy blood and treasure are spent, 3. the USA is deeply in debted to the rottenchild bankers who will raise interest at any time.

      And as a bonus…we are on the brink of WW3.

      Yes indeed we are so lucky to have the Jew bankers as our puimp and we will have debt slavery to “show for it”. .

      • mark

        What about the Saudi bankers. When your intelligence and ability to think rationally fail, blame it on the Jews. You’re a moron, plain and simple.

      • andrewp111

        Ruling the Middle East??? You are deluded by the disproportionate press coverage given to Israel. Israel is a little tiny side show with their little insignificant skirmish with Hamas. Who cares. The real action in the Middle East is ISIS. Their Caliphate is the real deal, and is on a roll right now. They will end up ruling the entire Islamic World. . People need to be paying more attention. Maybe when they conquer Saudi Arabia and behead the entire Royal Family, people will pay attention, but by then it will be too late.

  • FriendlyGoat

    The thing about political parties is that they, as entities, don’t “think hard”.

    So both parties are not going to “think hard” about nominating someone with particular expertise with respect to the intelligence services.

    But, there is little doubt that Hillary Clinton has more of it than anyone else running.

    • M Snow

      The architect of the Russian Reset and the Benghazi fiasco? Yeah, right.

    • TSIndiana

      We have enough lying lawyers in public offices. It’s about time that honest, non-lawyers are elected. Hillary is an accomplished liar….which America has had enough of.

  • Duperray

    Is US still a land of Freedom? Look at this, extracted from a US site (examiner.com), about how Federal legally grabs farmers’ money:
    “Now, Obama has the Dept. of Justice going after small farmers under the post-911 “Bank Secrecy Act” which makes it a crime to deposit less than $10,000 when you earned more than that.
    “The level we deposited was what it was and it was about the same every week,” Randy Sowers told Frederick News. The Sowers own and run South Mountain Creamery in Middletown, Maryland.
    Admittedly, when the Sowers earned over $10,000 in February, and learned they’d have to fill out paperwork at the bank for such large deposits, they simply rolled the deposits over to keep them below the none-of-your ****-business amount, rather than waste time on bureaucratic red tape aimed at flagging terrorism or other illegal activities.
    “Structuring,” explains Overlawyered.com, “is the federal criminal offense of splitting up bank deposits so as to keep them under a threshold such as $10,000 above which banks have to report transactions to the government.”
    While being questioned, the Sowers were finally presented with a seizure order and advised that the feds had already emptied their bank account of $70,000. The Dept. of Justice has since sued to keep $63,000 of the Sowers’ money, though they committed no crime other than maintaining their privacy.
    Without funds, they will be unable to make purchases for the spring planting.
    When a similar action was taken against Taylor’s Produce Stand last year, the feds seized $90,000, dropped the charges, and kept $45,000 of Taylor’s money.” –

    This so called “Justice” ought to investigate whether these farmers were manipulating dirty terrorists cash, at the end reimburse stolen money and compensating for expenses incurred by this long duration withdrawal.

    We never heard that soviet communist did that during soviet era.

  • rene591

    Let me be very clear. this nation is officially non interventionist and we have heard this scare tactic before. we no longer believe people who cry wolf when they have demonstrated a propensity to lie and waste trillions down a sand and mountain rat hole

  • donqpublic

    I’ll be glad when there’s a normal dirt bag demagogue, power seeking, all seeing, all knowing politician back in the White House again; I’m tired of being called a racist by a phony pandering to his cronies while getting squat on my savings account. I might even consider a douche bag for a change.

    • freedomliberty13

      The easy antidote to being called a racist is to list all the black conservatives you love & would rather see in the White House instead of Obama. THAT retort leaves Lefties slack jawed. Sometimes they say “well, yeah, but THEY are “Uncle Toms.” THAT makes my point for me. I LIKE THOSE blacks DUE TO THEIR POLITICAL OUTLOOK. It has NOTHING to do with skin color.

    • Steve Rodriguez

      Right….I’d prefer the traditional corrupt, criminal thief, narcissistic scumball who at least was half competent and loved his country – than what we have now, an incompetent buffoon who clearly does not.

      • andrewp111

        You are clearly hoping for Chris Christie in 2016.

  • freedomliberty13

    The Dems’ rhetorical tactic to try to shift the focus away from Obama’s lack of management experience & skills has been to blame “mean Repubs” for “not working with him.” I always counter with “so, in our roughly 250 year history, ALL opposing parties in Congress have rubber stamped presidents’ agendas, up until THIS “mean Congress?” I then offer the examples of Reagan & Bill Clinton who were previously governors in states in which the opposing parties ran the legislatures. THEY learned THERE how to effectively lead, manage, plan & negotiate – all skills necessary to be an effective president. Obama just didn’t learn those things as a community organizer in ultra blue Chicago. Common sense tells us that if you want “cooperation,” you don’t get there by demonizing your opponents in every speech you give. But demonizing IS SOMETHING that an Alinskyite community organizer would do. Obama is the “dog” who “chased the car” (presidency), and having “caught it” (winning in 2008) found that dogs can’t drive cars (he was incapable of competently governing).

  • bittman

    It hardly makes sense for our government to insist it must gather metadata on every Americans in order to ensure national security when it does not insist on gathering any information on the people who illegally enter our country via our unsecured border.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.