Captain Brown's Rail Fail
California Bullet Train Ignites Blue Mutiny
show comments
  • Michael Shorts

    “Making the case that $68 billion might be better spent on more pressing public needs”. There is no $68 billion. The money has never been found to build the high speed rail boondoggle.

    • Andrew Allison

      If suggesting better ways of spending imaginary money is what it takes to stop the bullet boondoggle, I’m all in favor.

      • Jim__L

        I don’t think Newsom and his cronies will stop at merely “suggesting better ways of spending”, they’ll spend it on whatever new boondoggles they can dream up, given half a chance.

        Holding up / stopping one big project whose base of support is questionable is quite possibly the best way of denying them that chance.

        As bad as Brown is, the prospect of his losing out in California to the
        likes of Newsom is truly horrific. (Might be what the CA GOP needs to reinvigorate itself, though. It’s never right to despair.)

  • bigfire

    The guy who wrote this proposition was cognisant about project money being redirected by governors and legislators for other purpose. He puts in clauses that the money cannot be use unless the train goes at a certain speed. Also that the High Speed Rail Authority have to come up with a comprehensive business plan. Current court case is dealing with both of these issue.

  • Gene

    Am I wrong to believe that a reasonably sentient being has no damned excuse for not having understood the stupidity of this train project back when it was passed in the first place? Am I supposed to credit this clown with courage and wisdom for changing his mind? Why more Democrats can’t apply some intellectual honesty to such situations is a mystery to me.

    • bigfire

      As a resident of California who voted against this boondoggle, I have this to say: It’s about spending the Federal Matching Fund. That’s it. It doesn’t matter if anything is ultimately lay down on the ground. The High Speed Train Authority’s only real mandate is to spend the money, ASAP on the politically connected cronies. Why do you think Diane Feinstein’s husband’s company got the no bid contract?

    • Bruce

      Because they win elections regardless in a broken state like CA. When it’s all said and done, it’s about the power and very little else.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.