State Wallet Tightens for Philadelphia Schools
show comments
  • Anthony

    Democracy is best served by extending to all children an equal opportunity to attend schools adequate for the achievement of self-realization, economic sufficiency, civic responsibility, and effective human relationships. Can public schools In a climate of change deliver the above given fiscal woes of financing public K-12 education?

    • Stacy Garvey

      The public schools haven’t delivered this for decades. Wake-up.

      • Anthony

        You missed the point. Education is literally a consumer’s good as well as a producer’s good. Sustainability has no ideology.

  • Pete

    “Pink slips were recently sent to 19 percent of the school-based work force, including all 127 assistant principals, 646 teachers and more than 1,200 aides.”

    It’s a start.

  • Anthony

    For those of you interested in charter schools, check this out. It’s a charter school in Harlem that is partially based on the school system in South Korea. The founder of the school taught in South Korea and decided to bring back some of the methods he saw there. This is pretty interesting.

  • bpuharic

    Again and again we see the middle class paying the costs of the recent 1% rampage through our economy.

    • Stacy Garvey

      The students finding their schools closing in Philly aren’t from the middle class. If by “middle class paying” you’re referring to the public employees who will lose their jobs due to school closing, then possibly you need to question why these systems exist: to educate students or as an make work job center? The 1% didn’t cause the massive waste and inefficiencies of the public school system either. Politicians pandering to unions and inflexible systems created this mess. Stop looking for a boogie-man or scape-goat to blame.

      • bpuharic

        States across the nation are facing this, with unions as the typical whipping boy. This is happening in non union states as well, but Americans love to beat up on unions since they reduce inequality. We’ve been born and bred to love and respect the wealthy, no matter how they acquire wealth and no matter what the social consequences.

        Teacher unions have been around a LONG time. This economic disaster we’re in started in November 2007.

        • Stacy Garvey

          Right. And states with weaker public service unions are experiencing less economic distress, with lower unemployment rates and greater job creation. Politicians wanted union dollars and support. They over-promised. Public schools in Chicago, Philly and Detroit are disasters even though they were adequately and generously funded for decades.

          • bpuharic

            Unions reduce inequality. The US is in the process of destroying its middle class, in the service of the 1%. The middle class has had a

            zero

            increase in wages in the last 30 years. The wealthiest 1%? They tripled their income.

            If you’re happy with the US going the way of Somalia, rejoice. If you’re worried about our future, you have good reason.

          • Stacy Garvey

            There is incredible inequality in the US, but unions – particularly public service unions don’t decrease inequality – they promote it. It’s not 1956 anymore. There’s a tremendous difference in the affects of public and private union membership. Public unions promote stagnation and inequality by locking the public into failing institutions that benefit rent seekers. The poor – forced into failing public schools – are the ones most damaged by systems that resist change.

          • bpuharic

            Nonsense. Timothy Noah’s recent “Slate” articles, and his recent book, show that globalization of education, along with the decline of unions, has had disastrous effects on the US middle class.

            And the point about public unions is also wrong. Few states are as ill served as those in the south…and they have no unions.

          • Stacy Garvey

            Well, thank goodness for Timothy Noah then. That settles it. You don’t actually need to make real points you can just make a call to authority. I suggest a class in rhetoric.
            I suggest you continue to keep your head buried firmly in the sand. I’m sure the world you envision will come to pass or good or naught.

          • bpuharic

            So I should believe you, because you listen to talk radio and hate unions, rather than someone who’s actually marshalled a case?

            Uh…no. Don’t think so.

          • Stacy Garvey

            Riggght. Do you enjoy type-casting your opponents? You might want to turn off MSNBC occasionally – there, how’s that feel? Engage with the argument: Unions reinforce inequality by creating a favored class of worker and by creating institutions that are rigid and resistant to change and poorly serve the public. try again.

          • bpuharic

            Well you have a bit of a problem here in your analysis…with the facts

            The US has one of the lowest rates of unionized workforces in the western world

            The US has one of the worst rates of inequality in the western world

            So go ahead and spin that.

          • Stacy Garvey

            You make it incredibly difficult to debate you when you cannot distinguish between public and private sector unions and you don’t actually address any salient point. But, again, good luck with that head in the sad tactic. Union members in Detroit aren’t going to be able to misunderstand the outcome of their failed union membership, though.

          • bpuharic

            While there are important differences between the 2, the fact is unions are healthy for America. Public unions have to be tempered, and there’s no proof states with no public unions are in better shape than those with unions. Unions are just a whipping boy for the failed right wing view of America as a meritocracy instead of the plutocracy it’s actually become.

          • Stacy Garvey

            Actually, there is ample proof that Right to Work states and those with weaker public sector union rights are doing “better” then blue states. Lower unemployment rates, higher levels of new job creation……Unions are just one aspect of the problem – rent seekers in all their forms – corporate and union are the source of economic stagnation.

          • bpuharic

            Yes America’s becoming a 3rd world country. The 1% tripled their income in the last 30 years while the middle class was stagnant. Great achievement.

  • No problem. Obama wants to give the schools high-speed internet. Problem solved.

  • Anthony

    The economics of education (public) remains the real investments in human capital – sustainability has no ideology.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.