Austrians to Pull Soldiers out of Israel-Syria Buffer Zone
show comments
  • wigwag

    Which is why the idea that if the Israelis and the Palestinian Authority ever signed a deal, the international community could police the deal by creating a buffer zone guarded by international troops is a joke.

    UNIFIL in Lebanon was supposed to keep Hezbollah from rearming; how did that work out? After Israel withdrew its troops from Gaza, EU forces were supposed to police Gaza’s border with Egypt to prevent arms smuggling. How long did that last?

    Come to think of it, in June 1967 UN troops headed for the hills at the first sign of trouble just as Austrian troops are now. After the Suez crisis of 1956 a buffer zone was created between Israeli forces and Egyptian forces. When Nasser got belligerent in 1967 and ordered the UN forces to withdraw, did they object? Nope; they meekly obeyed the Egyptian dictator.

    As good as the U.S. army and marines are, it took them two years to secure the short road between the airport in Baghdad and the Green Zone in the center of the city.
    The idea that Israel could ever rely on the United Nations, NATO, the EU or even the United States to police its border with a new Palestinian State is too absurd to even contemplate.
    Someone should explain this history to the dimwit who currently serves as Secretary of State.

    • bpuharic

      The question is, of course, why WOULD the US be interested in policing Israeli borders, or why we let ourselves be dragged into an interminable and insoluble situation.

  • Corlyss

    “We can’t help but wonder: if soldiers don’t belong in areas where there is “sustained deterioration of the security situation”, what are they for?”
    Stunning lack of analysis on the writer’s part. The UN rules of engagement are even more ridiculous than those the US military operates under in Iraq & Afpakia. Right now, a brave warrior is deciding to plead guilty to slaughter of innocents that should be considered collateral damage in a highly violent front. Murder charges and other scapegoating for such accidents is obscene when politicos make the decision to go into a warzone and then tell the warriors effectively to keep their guns unloaded (Reagan), never shoot civilians under any circumstances in a conflict where the bad guys all dress like civilians (with the result that according to their press every death is a civilian), but protect the weak from the predations of the strong. That’s a recipe concocted by lawyers, Europeans, and the craven, with the connivance of the enemy. There’s no such thing as success in such an environment.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.