US Shale Gas Boom Undermining Putin’s Gazprom
show comments
  • Corlyss Drinkard

    “a cagey, resentful and frustrated Russia facing economic decline and increasing powerlessness on the world stage is good for no one at all.”
    Okay. I’ll agree with you later. In the meantime, I want to savor yet another blow to the pompous, arrogant, savage, paranoid purveyors of so much misery in the 70 years the Russian tyrants masqueraded as Jesus delivering a modern Eden to impoverished peoples.

  • Jim Luebke

    Question: How does Russia stack up against Turkey these days?

    Would an alliance between Turkey and Georgia put Georgia in a position to reclaim Abkhazia and South Ossetia, or was the assertion that “Turkey has the strongest army in Europe these days” ignore Russia?

    • bigfire

      I won’t put too much stock on the Turkish army now aday. When Mustafa Kemal Atatürk established modern Turkey, he went out of his way to institute a secular military whose constitution charge include the duty to overthrow the government that stray from the constitution.

      The current Islamic government seemed to be able to by-pass that safeguard. I don’t see too much hope there.

      • Mr X

        A Swedish institute put our a study indicating that due to the costs of LNG infrastructure shipping shale gas via tanker to the EU from the US is not nearly as cost effective as advertised. That’s not to say Gazprom isnt in for very hard times but WRM misstates the source of competition it is Norwegian gas, not US LNG. And it is the desperation of much of the EU driving down prices, not Chesapeake or Cherniere Energy. Plus in the long term if Gazprom can modernize/strip down gas makes more sense as a transport/trucking fuel in Europe than in the US due to greater population density reliance on buses. Finally I think WRM and the anti Russia neocons who influence his thinking badly underestimate Russia’s growing clout as a global grain exporter, particularly if North American droughts persist for many years. Russian grain unlike Monsantos oligopoly is non GMO

  • ghark729

    About 60 or 70 years ago…

    …there was some guy standing in an oil field thinking, “Hey! I’ll bet there is more oil and gas
    down there. I’ll bet if we could figure out a way to expand the cracks and fissures in the rock it would start flowing like crazy.”

    Whoever that guy is, he changed the world. I wonder if he is alive and knows what is

  • Guy Cocoa

    “Speaking on state television on March 30, Gazprom Chief Executive Alexei Miller minimized the impact of gas from U.S. shale fields, extracted using hydraulic-fracturing techniques. He predicted that it was a ‘bubble that will burst very soon. We are skeptical about shale gas. We don’t see any risks [to us] at all.’ ”

    Of course not now that the election is over Obama has more “flexibility.” Such as, the EPA determining fracking is harmful and shutting it down or that we should not be exporting coal and allow Europeans to put CO2 into the atmosphere. I expect the Kremlin still has full control of the Manchurian Candidate.

  • kk9909

    Interesting take on Russia’s role in natural gas. I found an informative read on the future effects of natural gas. Take a look.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.