Understanding the New Egypt
show comments
  • Mick The Reactionary

    Rostropovich’s piece has a great deal of inside game.

    Not so much for deep insights. Rabinovich is so blinded by all those trees he sees, he cannot see the forest.
    Given his deep links with US neocons and academics, it is a surprise he makes any sense at all.

    For clarity and insights, not necessarily PC insights, the blog of Israeli Professor Barry Rubin is highly recommended: rubinreports.blogspot.com.

    Reality is rather simple. West is weak, PC, lost its senses and afraid of Muslims.
    It was a long time since the last good lesson Muslims had, ie took a good beating.

    Moslems feel empowered and willing to do what they always wanted to do, wage a holy war on infidel.

    The last good beating Israel administered to Egypt was 40 years ago, 2 generations ago.

    Egypt’s youts are free of fear and itching for a fight, a bad development. It will end up badly.

    No amount of verbal pollution from “experts” can change that.

    US Foreign Policy establishment is bi-partisan and insane. Bushobama foreign policy is deferential to Islamics and senseless. Romney’s is likely to be the same, subject to tighter money constraints.

    Israel will be alone in teaching Egypt and Muslims the much needed lesson.

    Do they have strong clear-headed leaders to do it?

  • Mick The Reactionary

    “Rostropovich’s piece”

    My bad, a Freudian slip.
    While we all should enjoy the great late Mstislav Rostropovich music as often as we can, the name of the author is Itamar Rabinovich.

  • Kris

    [email protected]: Israel still seems to be hoping for the best (or biding their time until the Iranian nuclear situation is settled), as can be seen by their not dealing with the Jihadist activity in the Sinai themselves, but rather acquiescing to Egypt supposedly doing so by streaming military forces into the Sinai, in opposition to the terms of their peace treaty.

  • Mick The Reactionary

    @Kris says:

    “Israel still seems to be hoping for the best (or biding their time until the Iranian nuclear situation is settled)”

    Sinai problem is a low priority compare to Iran. I guess Israel is waiting for one or two events, perhaps both:

    1. At some point Iran has to bring all their enriched uranium to a single place to actually make a nuke. Ideally Israel knows the place and will know the time and will attempt to destroy all Iranian nuke material at that time.

    2. US Prez Election. Israel can count on Romney being at best a supporter, at worst a lukewarm bystander. BHO at the very best will be neutral and at worst will try to actively sabotage Israel.

  • Kris

    [email protected]:

    “Ideally Israel knows the place and will know the time and will attempt to destroy all Iranian nuke material at that time.”

    How dare they! After all, there will be no “proof” that Iran plans on attacking Israel with said material which is not yet even a weapon, and as an Israeli strike would spread this radioactive material around, the strike itself should be considered a crime against humanity!

    [/sarc]

    Regarding the timing: if you think that Romney will win, you can argue that Israel is better off waiting. If, on the other hand, you think Obama will win, you could argue that Israel is better off attacking before the election, while Obama will still be careful about appearing too hard on Israel.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.