Global Food Crisis Sparks Calls for G20 Meet
show comments
  • Albert

    Oh please! This will only turn into the usual game of blame the rich countries and send more money ASAP. The usual suspects need to top up their Swiss bank accounts before they are overthrown…

  • Thrasymachus

    Given the amount of time both campaigns are spending in Iowa, the likelihood of either candidate saying anything remotely negative about Ethanol before November is approximately zero. The likelihood of Congress actually doing anything about Ethanol between now and then is *exactly* zero.

  • Eurydice

    Also, this week, there’ve been several articles in various sources (WP, for one) about how the world’s aquifers are drying up. The battle for water isn’t a new story, but it seems people are looking at it again.

  • Corlyss

    A G-20 meeting is useful only if they bring their food grains with them to give to the ever-demanding poor.

  • Jacksonian Libertarian

    I agree the use of Food, for the production of alcohol for fuel, and the use of Tax payer’s money to subsidize the activity is despicable. But what can you expect from Environmentalists, they want mankind dead so that Gaia will be unsoiled, and starving people to death helps them achieve their goal.

  • rkka

    I have good news for Mead, and bad news for Mead.

    “Condemning poor people to starvation in order to help green gentry liberals feel better about themselves does not strike us as a good use of scarce food resources.”

    The bad news for Mead is that one of Mead’s interns has misspelled “Corn belt conservative legislators”

    The good news for Mead is that he gets to flog said intern.

  • Jacksonian Libertarian

    OMG! This could be the end of civilization! The BACON must Flow! The situation is clear, “Bacon is Meat Candy” and “Everything is Better with Bacon” both illustrate the fact that life just isn’t worth living without Bacon. I fully expect suicide rates to skyrocket across Europe as the truth of their horrifying future and miserable existence sinks in. I will be praying that the same fate doesn’t befall us here in America.

  • Indiana Farmer

    I agree that we need to work away from requiring ethanol in gasoline. However, I don’t think we need to turn our back on it if the economics would happen to work in the free market. Another problem would be the supply chain disruption if ethanol was suddenly cut off. Removing something that was providing 10% of our auto fuel would cause price spikes, as evidenced by the price bump recently caused by refinery issues.

  • Tom

    @rkka: Not wrong, merely incomplete.

  • Kris

    I have good news for [email protected], and bad news for rkka.

    “Corn belt conservative legislators”

    The bad news is that he has misspelled “members of both parties who otherwise hold very different political opinions”.

    The good news is that he has successfully identified this as a bipartisan problem. Which is not good news for any of us.

  • rkka

    9 & 10

    Seriously?

    Greenies slag corn ethanol because it is utter [garbage] as an energy source. EROEI of 2. Maybe.

    (Energy Return on Energy Invested)

    Rkka had it right the first time. It’s corn belt conservative congresscritters. Y’all are out to lunch almost as much as Mead is.

  • Mark in Texas

    rkka

    Greenies slag corn ethanol after years of demanding it because it is actually practical and actually being done. Environmentalists only like to propose things that have no chance of working. If it actually makes people’s lives better they hate it. That goes double if the people who’s lives are improved are Americans.

    Because of corn ethanol we are raising the octane of gasoline making it possible to build more efficient engines and reversing a trend that occurred in the 1970s when the removal of lead from gasoline resulted in lower compression, less efficient engines that had less horsepower and got worse mileage.

    There is the added benefit that we send less money to the Middle East as well as sending them less food.

  • FergalR

    Every time an uniformed person types the acronym EROEI Newton’s ghost punches a kitten.

  • Kris

    [email protected]: Congratulations on completely missing the point, as usual. Of course the ethanol policy is pandering to the Corn Belt. But just where did you pull that “conservative legislators” from? I’ll be glad to provide you with examples of this policy being thoroughly bipartisan. (If you’ll agree not to twist the label “conservative” beyond all recognition.)

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.