Excellent News, Smithers!
show comments
  • Stephen Clark

    Nicely played. Still chuckling at your headline for this piece.

  • Jacksonian Libertarian

    It’s interesting that you mention the strategic petroleum reserve, as set up this reserve can only supply 1 million barrels a day of our 18 million barrel usage, and that for only ~700 days (not very strategic). I think we should sell all that oil and use the money for capital investment in the retorts, mining equipment, etc… To develop the 2 Trillion barrels of shale oil of the green river basin in Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado. This would provide a bottomless supply of true strategic value, which could be expanded to provide energy independence if so needed or desired.

  • Toni

    Here’s to the wonderful wildcatters who keep finding oil where noone previously thought to look!

    Think about it. Nobody has ever seen an oilfield. Oilfields lurk thousands of miles below the earth’s surface, and sometimes under a mile or two of seawater as well. To find these well-hidden underground pools is a technological feat. That feat must be preceded by an act of human imagination, by explorers whose minds boldly go where no drill has gone before.

    Is that hokey? I think too many people take for granted the imagination, technology and multibillion-dollar risks the industry takes to find new sources of oil to fill their gas tanks.

    It’s risky because (conspiracy theorists notwithstanding) oilmen don’t control the price of oil. They can invest their billions and watch the price fall by half, or worse, have the investment expropriated by a loon like Chavez. Most of the world’s richest oil territory is owned by the state, in the MidEast, much of Africa, in Mexico and Venezuela and Alaska and North America’s East and West Coasts. Or it’s controlled by crooks, as in Russia, the world’s largest exporter.

    So we depend on the risk-takers who venture ever farther into the deep Gulf of Mexico or untapped territory off the West African coast or — now — off the South American coast. (Pumping oil offshore is safer than onshore where it’s prey to villains like the Sudanese rebels. Or Chavez.)

    My grandfather was a roughneck on some of the world’s first offshore wells, in Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela in the 1930s, and I covered oil as a journalist for a couple of decades. I saw oil plummet from ~$40 a barrel in 1981-82 to $9 in 1986. Some 400,000 Americans lost their jobs, more than steelworkers and autoworkers combined in the early 1980s recession. Nobody cared.

    Oil companies and their workers exercise skills and take risks outsiders don’t appreciate. I wish they did.

    Here endeth the paean.

  • Paul

    Though the bulk of Toni’s post on wildcatters is certainly correct, I must add one minor point: I, and many others, including Plutarch, have seen oil fields. Mine were in Kuwait and Iraq; there were places in which, from the air, one could see that the oil literally bubbles up out of the ground. These areas were once considered poisonous wastes. Times change.

  • Toni

    Paul, yes, I know. In 1859 Col. Drake drilled the first oilwell in Pennsylvania in an area of oil seeps. Now I doubt any seeps exist worldwide because everyone knows black gold lurks underneath.

    But seeps are only evidence of a field beneath. Nobody has eyeballed the pockets in underground rocks where dinosaurs and vegetation died and produced petroleum.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.