Another Blue Pension Crisis: In San Francisco
show comments
  • I wouldn’t get carried away with the blue red stuff here. Vallejo, the poster child for public benefit mismanagement, is an old labor city, soft on union organizing among public employees. But it is also socially as conservative as any place in Calif. SF is less sharply defined but it has an undercurrent of worker-unionists, also socially conservative (remember Eric Hoffer, the stevedore-philosopher?). San Diego, whose pension problems are some of the worst in the state (or nation) is in many ways a deeply conservative place.

  • Jim.

    Do a little more digging — I’m pretty sure there was a scandal a few years back where San Fransisco City Schools could not account for $500 million worth of spending.

    And people thought LA was Chinatown…

  • Bruce,

    That is something I have been hitting a lot on my blog lately. Social conservative /= fiscal conservative. Why so many socons say it does is a mystery to me. Liberals are not the only people living in fantasy land.

  • Rod Rescueman

    How can San Francisco possibly “stiff its youth”? The city doesn’t have youth anymore. The schools are closing left and right because the people of SF are are child-less now.

    Why would anyone want to raise a child there, anyway?

  • Corlyss

    @Rod
    “Why would anyone want to raise a child there, anyway?”

    Because Americans haven’t evolved to the point the English have? I.e., we don’t send our kids away and keep the pets at home.

  • I used to spend a lot of money in SF.
    I no longer go there.

  • bobby b

    ” . . . will SF stiff its youth and the poor by cutting services to cover its pension costs — or will it break the promises it made to employees in the past? . . . Either choice is contemptible . . .”

    One small quibble, and it’s probably just a word-choice quibble at that:

    The two choices that will be available to the city aren’t contemptible in and of themselves.

    What was contemptible was the choice, back whenever it was made and each time it was made, to allow the pension fund to become liable for the promised employee benefit dollars without making the concomitant and required transfer of funds from the city’s available cash into the appropriate fund account.

    They not only said they’d gladly pay tomorrow for a hamburger today. They made sure they left their wallets at home when tomorrow came. That was contemptible.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.