Advice To Young Readers: Ignore Ames
show comments
  • Kenny

    “Ignore ames.”

    Exactly right.

  • gh

    This seems to be a completely pointless blog post. I’d advise young people to ignore the blogger.

  • jb

    To preface my remark, I do not vote and have not since the Pappy Bush debacle in ’92.

    There is only one politician who understands monetary and fiscal policy, the threat of the Fed, and his constitutional responsibilities. The other 536 are abject failures.

    And it is strangely odd that a post like this, and on many other sites, suddenly are disparaging what were dynamic indicators of electability in years past, and now don’t “matter” . . .

    Ron Paul might win the straw poll, and pseudo-conservatives and the GOP (whatever they have become anymore!), are beside themselves about Paul.

    It is hilarious to watch. The right wants real change as little as do the communists and the Bammster.

    It’s fun to watch the scrambling.

  • Tea Party Veteran

    Obamabot blogger here? Stupid article with illogical premise.

  • Rico

    gh must be a Pulbot

  • af

    GH, why should anyone care about any poll where candidates are actively allowed to stuff the ballot box?

  • James

    Translation —

    Ron Paul will win the 2011 Ames Straw Poll

  • Steve S.

    Important to whom? When?

    Would this be in the same manner of ignoring Gov. Perry’s speech, in that he is not going to say anything we don’t already know? Is this in the manner of ignoring President Obama’s speeches, in that they have so far proved unenlightening?

    How shall our young people learn to recognize fluff if they don’t see it, or experience it?

    • Walter Russell Mead

      @Steve S: I’m not worried about our young people being underexposed to fluff.

  • Great post!

  • Pete Dellas

    Though this straw poll is like a big campaign event and has no real balance, it certainly provides opportunities for viewers to hear the candidates and their views. And the Thurday debate helped to do the same.

    Am I to assume you mean pay no attention to the winner of the poll? That the win is meaningless? If so, perhaps I agree. But I would rather have young people watching the events in Ames than, say “The Jersey Shore.” At least they’ll be able to glean bits of useful info from the candidates.

  • Jim.

    It looks like Ames this year meant at least, “Tim Pawlenty will not be our next president”.

    Maybe he shouldn’t have given up. McCain came in 10th last time around (though one could argue his lack of Conservative credentials hurt him at both Ames and with base turnout in the general.)

    Reagan lost to GHWB in 1979. GHWB lost to Pat Robertson in 1987. McCain lost (badly!) to Romney in 2007. Dole tied for 1st in 1995.

    If you’re looking for predictive power in this poll, it’s pretty clear you’re not going to find it.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.