walter russell mead peter berger lilia shevtsova adam garfinkle andrew a. michta
Feed
Features
Reviews
Podcast
The Ukraine-EU Deal That Wasn't

RUSSIA-UKRAINE-DIPLOMACY-ECONOMY

Last week was supposed to be a landmark time for Ukraine. At least, the EU hoped it might be. Ukraine was set to sign a free trade and association agreement with the EU in Vilnius until talks broke down last week and Kiev pulled out of the deal. Brussels tried to rescue the deal, but was rebuffed by Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich, who seems intent on moving east towards Russia instead. Raymond Sontag reflects on the EU’s failure to lure Ukraine in a piece for The American Interest Online:

Russia’s success in dissuading Ukraine from closer relations with the EU should not have come as a surprise. Russia, it turns out, had much more to lose than the EU had to gain, and it acted accordingly. The Kremlin has met each of Ukraine’s steps toward an EU deal with punitive economic measures and, had the agreement been signed, much more severe sanctions could have been expected. The EU, for its part, offered few inducements and the agreement actually would have imposed significant economic hardship on Ukraine in the near term. Beyond this, EU leaders thought it wise to prod Ukraine to improve its human rights record as a precondition to the agreement.

Given the all-too-obvious constraints Ukraine’s leaders faced, why didn’t EU leaders anticipate that they’d opt out of the agreement? And why didn’t EU leaders anticipate that Russia would tip the balance of power in its favor in a place it very much wants in its sphere of influence? […]

Simply put, “balance of power” and “spheres of influence” are just as real today as they were in the 19th century or during the Cold War. Believing that we’ve evolved beyond these things does nothing to diminish their reality. As Sweden’s Foreign Minister Carl Bildt tweeted in the wake of the DCFTA’s collapse, “Ukraine government suddenly bows deeply to the Kremlin. Politics of brutal pressure evidently works.” Indeed it does work and EU leaders must learn to operate in a world where this is the case.

This deal was one of the most important geopolitical stories going until it disintegrated, and Sontag’s piece does an excellent job explaining why Kiev snubbed Brussels for Moscow. It’s worth taking the time to read the whole thing. The EU brought a baguette to a knife fight, and was harshly reminded of the limits of soft power.

[Viktor Yanukovych and Vladimir Putin photo courtesy of Getty Images]

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Corlyss

    There was so much handwriting on the walls about America, Europe, and Russia, that it looked like NYC subways in the bad old days soon to be the city’s future under Red Bill

  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    This isn’t a done deal yet. The opposition political parties are now pushing Yanukovich with another huge demonstration this Sunday just like the 100,000 people that showed up last Sunday. The majority of Ukrainians want to be part of Europe, not a part of Russia as they already know what that means, and they are making their voices heard. Putin is unlikely to win this one, without a really big carrot, because his stick just isn’t very intimidating.

  • Atanu Maulik

    Simply put, “balance of power” and “spheres of influence” are just as real today_______Once upon a time European leaders were quite comfortable grappling with those ideas. Then they lost those skills. They will learn yet again that if they do not go out and shape the world, others will shape the world for them and that world may not be to their liking.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2014 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service