mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
Back to the Future
Russians in Nicaragua

With the world focused on Syria, North Korea, Ukraine, and other pressing hotspots, the Russians have expanded their presence in Latin America and the Caribbean. Last week, the Washington Post revealed that the Russians erected a mysterious satellite-tracking compound in Managua that may double as an electronic intelligence-gathering base. This is just the latest example of the increasing partnership between the Kremlin and banana republic leader Daniel Ortega (yes, the same Ortega who gave Reagan fits and provoked the Iran-Contra affair in the ‘80s).

Three decades after this tiny Central American nation became the prize in a Cold War battle with Washington, Russia is once again planting its flag in Nicaragua. Over the past two years, the Russian government has added muscle to its security partnership here, selling tanks and weapons, sending troops, and building facilities intended to train Central American forces to fight drug trafficking.

The Russian surge appears to be part of the Kremlin’s expansionist foreign policy. In other parts of the world, President Vladimir Putin’s administration has deployed fighter planes to help Syria’s war-battered government and stepped up peace efforts in Afghanistan, in addition to annexing the Crimean Peninsula and supporting separatists in Ukraine […]

As the Beltway world untangles the Trump camp’s links to Moscow, American officials are also puzzling over Russian intentions in its obscure former stomping ground. Current and former U.S. officials suspect that the new Russian facilities could have “dual use” capabilities, particularly for electronic espionage aimed at the United States. Security analysts see the military moves in Central America as a possible rebuttal to the increased U.S. military presence in Eastern Europe, showing that Russia can also strut in the United States’ back yard.

Aside from challenging the two-hundred-year-old Monroe Doctrine, Russian spymasters may see a tactical advantage for being in Nicaragua—namely, the opportunity to intercept American Internet traffic running through an underwater fiber optic cable linking Miami to Latin America and the Caribbean. Indeed, the decision to station “about 250 military personnel” in the country and to give Ortega 50 T-72 tanks for free makes clear that they’re probably not there for the coffee.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Beauceron

    You mean sort of like the ones we have scattered all over the world?

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/211734cc5668942c3c47d789f6c56f678da2dfd4d41c68fc36931a7b3eec832a.gif

    • D4x

      WithOUT planting the refrain “As the Beltway world untangles the Trump camp’s links to Moscow,” WaPo as a news source confers no credibility.

  • Isaiah601

    Everybody is spying on everybody. Same as it ever was. Methods change, technologies change, the basic human nature does not.

  • Andrew Allison

    Ahhh, the Obama legacy . . . .

    • Boritz

      Don’t discount the ‘Dear Commandante’ letter of 10 congressional Democrats.

  • FriendlyGoat

    There are so many places one might wish visit with a MOAB. Some of the situations come with readily salable rationales, and some not so much.

    • Isaiah601

      I know…. We should be fighting ISIS with State sponsored health care, not bombs. NAILED IT!!!

      • ——————————

        LMAO….

  • Fat_Man

    The nations surrounding the Gulf of Mexico are on our back door. It is a vital interest of the United States that they not be allied with hostile powers. The regimes in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela must be replaced ASAP, vi et armis, if necessary.

    The Monroe Doctrine was a good doctrine, but it has been a dead letter since 1958. It must be revived.

  • PCB

    I have taken much heat for my position in support of Obama’s re-opening channels with Cuba; in my view, whatever Obama’s reasoning was for its Cuba rapprochement, a side-benefit may well be a U.S. foot-hold in this former Soviet quasi-satellite, one that may greatly limit Putin’s ability to increase Russia’s presence and influence just 90 miles off the U.S. shore – placing itself especially within reach of poking Uncle Sam in the eye.

    While I have been opposed to nearly every policy out of the Obama White House, this piece only solidifies my concerns and support for a renewed American presence (however feeble and however hard to stomach), in Cuba.

  • Well, I am no fan of Putin, but if the U.S. and NATO are steadily expanding into Russia’s backyard, do they not have the right to increase their political influence in Latin America in turn?

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service