mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
overregulated
Daycare Credentialism in the District

As of 2014, the average annual cost of childcare for a single 4-year old in the District of Columbia was $16,908—the highest in the country. But the local government is determined to make it even more unaffordable. Inside Higher Education reports:

A new regulation in Washington sets an associate degree as the minimum credential for a lead teacher in a child-care center. The District of Columbia’s child-care providers have until December 2020 to meet the new regulation. Child-care directors must also earn at least a bachelor’s degree, and home-care providers and assistant teachers must have a child development associate credential, which is an entry-level certificate for providers.

This regulation will have a similar impact to licensing requirements that have proliferated across other service jobs, forcing manicurists, florists, and personal trainers to go through thousands of hours of expensive and often gratuitous training to be able to work. That is, it will artificially raise the price of services, entrench established businesses, and shut less-skilled people out of the labor market.

Proponents of the policy argue that it will help level the playing field for low-income children. But the evidence that forcing daycare teachers to earn degrees will on its own meaningfully improve children’s outcomes is shaky. And it seems more likely that the regulation will simply force working class parents who don’t qualify for subsidies to pull their children out of daycare altogether as the decline in competition jacks up prices.

We will await results in the coming years, but this policy seems like dead-end credentialism that will hurt aspiring teachers, working parents and their children for the benefit of high-end daycare facilities and the community colleges who will be able to charge tuition from a wave of involuntary new enrollees.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • seattleoutcast

    More unfair costs imposed unfairly upon the poor due to regulation.

    But, but, but… Republicans!!!

  • dave schutz

    Right across the river in Arlington this exact issue came up, with very expensive regs proposed. The outcome in Arlington was a full on revolt by parents and providers for whom the new regs were out of reach, and pull-back.

    • Jim__L

      More full-on revolts like this are essential to the survival of the Republic.

      It doesn’t have to be violent — it just has to be well-organized, confident, and insistent.

  • ——————————

    More of government stroking academia’s **** at the expense of the proletariat…..

  • FriendlyGoat

    How much for a vasectomy these days?

    • Jim__L

      Easy. Just cut off the Social Security and Medicare checks to anyone who advocates or undergoes a vasectomy, and it’s paid for.

      • FriendlyGoat

        Recently, I blocked texasjimbo, Tom and all known user names of JR from my own view on Disqus. My life has been much (much) more pleasant since. Today, I just blocked Jim_L, too. Why? I just I just got tired of being harassed with ridiculousness. Tired of the digs. Tired of the whole game with you guys. Bye, Jim.

        • Jim__L

          And the bubble gets that much thicker.

  • QET

    It will also keep the “universal daycare/more federal money for daycare” themes alive for the next few election cycles, allowing Democrats (and, sadly, an increasing number of Republicans) to do what they do best: pander.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service