mead berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
K-12 Blues
Pensions Punish Teachers Who Switch Careers

It’s become a cliché that the U.S. labor market, as a whole, is growing more flexible and dynamic. Companies and industries rise and fall at a faster pace, and workers switch jobs and even careers more frequently than their parents did.

But even as private sector workers are rewarded for embracing these new realities, civil servants—and especially teachers—are encouraged to resist them. As Chad Alderman writes in a New York Daily News op-ed, existing public sector pension systems punish teachers who switch careers:

New teachers in New York, as in 14 other states, must stay for 10 years before qualifying for any retirement benefit. That would be illegal in the private sector. […]

Those long waiting periods mean a lot of teachers won’t qualify for a pension from their pension system. In New York City, for example, less than half of new teachers make it to the 10-year mark. They’ll leave with their own contributions and a little bit of interest, but they won’t get any portion of their employer’s contribution. […]

That having been said, there is one group of teachers who do well under the current pension systems. For teachers who stay for 25 or 30 years, the pension plan will finally start to deliver comfortable retirement benefits. About 20% of teachers will teach for their entire careers, and they’ll reap the full rewards of the existing system.

The problem with existing civil service pension system isn’t just that the public can’t afford it; it’s that benefits are distributed inefficiently, lavishly rewarding veteran teachers at the expense of people who teach for shorter stints. Relatedly, much of the funding for these pension systems goes to paying down debt for previous unfunded obligations, suppressing salaries for teachers early in their careers, no matter how successful they are.

While this system benefits unions, its much less clear whether it benefits the students that the education system is supposed to serve. As we’ve said before, “the idea that teaching should be a lifelong career protected and underwritten by unions should be questioned more often.” A teacher corps with higher turnover, that kept new blood running through the system and aggressively promoted capable and enthusiastic professionals, might lead to higher-quality service overall. But so long as teachers unions remain firmly in control of educational policy in many state capitols, we are more likely to see continued blue model retrenchment than forward-looking reform.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Anthony

    “While this system benefits unions, its much less clear whether it benefits the students that the education is supposed to serve…A teacher corps with higher turnover, that kept new blood running through the system and aggressively promoted capable and enthusiastic professionals, might lead to higher-quality service overall.”

    An idea deserving of consideration by claimants advocating for “High Achieving Public Schools” K-12.

  • Greg Olsen

    Having taught products of the New York City public school system at Hunter College, the bribe of a fat pension is probably the only way to get a teacher to stick around. Back in the 90s the most dangerous time on the New York subway was between 3 and 4 pm when the schools let out.

  • FriendlyGoat

    Let us know how it goes when you tell conservatives you want to vest teachers in public pensions on the basis of fewer year of service because you want to be fair to the participants in higher turnover “to keep new blood running through the syetem”. (Oh, you didn’t mean that at all?)

  • Andrew Allison

    It’s certainly the case that teachers unions have been allowed to perpetuate a scam which would (assuming that such a thing were possible) make Wells Fargo blush, but shouldn’t we also view this as just another example of the refusal of the average American to look after their own future? Is the typical entry-level teacher too uneducated to have figured this out or has teaching become, for too many, a way-station on the way to getting a real job? I hasten to add that I had the benefit of many real teachers (whom I remember fondly) while growing up, teachers who actually cared about their students rather than their pension and honor them.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service