Iran followed up the test-launched of a series of ballistic missiles on Tuesday with another test Wednesday—and broadcast the event around the country and the world. So far, the White House has temporized in its response. But the front-runner for the Democratic Presidential nomination had a different reaction. Reuters reports:
Iranian state television showed footage of two Qadr missiles being launched from northern Iran, which the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said hit targets 1,400 km (870 miles) away.
Iranian agencies said the missiles were stamped with the Hebrew words, “Israel should be wiped from the pages of history,” though the inscription could not be seen on any photographs.
Clinton, a former secretary of state under President Barack Obama, said she was “deeply concerned” by the tests, the second round of Iranian missile launches in two days.
“Iran should face sanctions for these activities and the international community must demonstrate that Iran’s threats toward Israel will not be tolerated,” said Clinton, who is ahead in the race to be Democratic nominee at the Nov. 8 presidential elections.
Her call for sanctions reflected a tougher line against Iran’s recent missile activity than that taken so far by the White House, which said it is aware of and reviewing reports of the Iranian tests, and would determine an appropriate response.
“We know that Iran is in a season of carrying out a number of military activities, and so it certainly would not be a surprise if there are additional launches over the next several days,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
It’s widely thought in the foreign-policy community that Secretary Clinton’s views are more hawkish on foreign policy than those of the President she once served. So far, she has avoided open disagreement with the President (though signalled disagreements to those paying attention), while trying to win a surprisingly competitive Democratic nomination race.
But nobody expects the world to get any more peaceful in between now and November. Is this the beginning of an increasingly different, increasingly hawkish, increasingly more public line from the Secretary?