mead berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
The President and the Peace Process
Obama Takes Fresh Tilt at Windmill

ISIS holds its “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq, Yemen and Libya are burning, Turkey is falling into despotism, Russia is on the march in Europe and the Middle East, and China is acting as aggressively as ever in the South China Sea. And in the White House, they observe all of this, and think—wouldn’t it be a great time to take another crack at the Israel-Palestine peace process? The Wall Street Journal reports:

The [White House’s] internal discussions are aimed at offering a blueprint for future Israeli-Palestinian talks in a bid to advance a critical foreign-policy initiative that has made little progress during Mr. Obama’s two terms in the White House, the officials said.

The strongest element on the list of options under consideration would be U.S. support for a Security Council resolution calling on both sides to compromise on key issues, something Israel had opposed and Washington has repeatedly vetoed in the past.

Other initiatives could include a presidential speech and a joint statement from the Middle East Quartet, an international group comprising the U.S., the United Nations, the European Union and Russia.

A senior administration official said no final decisions have been made and that Mr. Obama is considering a range of possibilities. The timing of any new White House move hasn’t been determined, but officials said it would be later this year.

The push comes as Vice President Biden visits Israel and Palestine—and as the Palestinians are in the middle of a “stabbing Intifada.” Indeed, a Palestinian attacker killed an American tourist yesterday. The push also comes with the backing of the French, who have been pushing for some form of U.N.-mandated Israeli recognition of Palestine for some time now. Notably absent from those who are interested in serious negotiations right now: Israel and the Palestinians.

Absent too: the Sunni Arabs. Riyadh is friendly with Jerusalem these days, not least due to mutual distrust of the last deal the White House negotiated in the region. And the issues in the Middle East that concern the regional powers—the Sunni-Shi’a battles in Syria and Iraq, the Kurdish struggles for nationalism, and the Iranian-Saudi proxy war in Yemen—are not linked to the Israel-Palestine Conflict, except in the mind of a certain type of Western liberal.

And so one of the few places this is seen as somehow the right move at the right time is the White House, which has periodically returned to chase this dream when it’s run out of ideas elsewhere. As we wrote in November, the last time the Administration considered making a Peace Process push:

[F]or John Kerry (and other Western diplomats just like him), going back to the Arab-Israeli negotiating table isn’t driven by external need. Not even he can think that resolving the border between Israel and the West Bank is the key to peace in the Middle East anymore. This is the Secretary going to his Happy Place—where there are Nobel Peace Prizes to be won, an age-old diplomatic puzzle to be resolved, and most of all, familiar problems to be confronted with familiar tools.

It’s all so very comfortable. But that’s not the world we live in anymore. Time for Secretary Kerry—and the rest—to wake up. And maybe tell the pilot to change course for Ankara.

We imagine this attempt will have about the same long-term impact on Israeli-Palestinian peace as that attempt did, too. And it’s worth noting that Turkey is in even worse shape now than it was then. There’s still time to pay attention to issues that matter, where good might be done—if anyone cares to.

Otherwise, good luck with the next tilt against the windmill.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Ellen

    Thank you for that piece of wisdom. No one, of course, expects anyone in the White House to pay attention to something so common sensical. Arab-Israeli peace processes are the raison d’etre of an entire industry of people who are on the verge of being put permanently out of work. Hence they cling to the fantasy that the problems of the mideast trace back to this particular small conflict and that this conflict will be solved diplomatically. It won’t be.

    This reminds me of similar episodes back in the 1980’s regarding Arab terrorism, during its early stages. There was a whole crew of people who specialized in explaining to Western audiences why Arabs were blowing up planes and murdering people in the name of Palestine. Whenever a terrorist incident would start, hostages would be taken, and the countdown to some atrocity would begin, the experts would race to get their makeup on so they could speak into the cameras with their usual explanations. The same is true today with the Israel-Palestinian peace process. Every small incident is an excuse to get the makeup on again and prepare the usual meetings in Geneva to discuss “peace.” Meanwhile a wholesale slaughter is going on north of this supposed conflict and 2-3 countries are being prepared for partition.

    Never mind, John Kerry and Barack Obama must go to their Happy Place.

  • qet

    Hey, who knows? Maybe it’ll divert everyone’s attention from Iran and Syria and Libya and Iraq and ISIS and Afghanistan. Make everyone remember that it’s those Jews–sorry, Israelis—who are the real problem over there. Worth a shot, right? Lame duck, nothing to lose.

    TAI’s November analysis was correct. It’s like a play where everyone knows his part.

  • Fat_Man

    They won’t do anything before the election. They can’t upset the apple cart for Hillary, who is going to need a boat load of money to dump that mountain of mud* on the Donald.

    * All true. The Donald is a scum bucket. But, advertising is not free.


      I am pretty sure everyone except her base realizes her apple cart is already upset, especially the foreign policy one which she never talks about.

      • Fat_Man

        The base is not a problem. The problem is the $2.5 Billion dollar war chest that she needs. Obama can’t rile up her donors.


    Any bets we’ll see Obama make a deal with Iran that they can go ahead with their ballistic missile testing if they sign the Israeli-Palestinian Agreement. That would make two signers US and Iran and Obama will call it a large coalition.

  • Lillian Loran

    Are you single tonight? A lot of beautiful girls waiting for you to )))

  • FriendlyGoat

    You never know. There are (probably) now some “Arabs” who trust Israel much more than they trust the batsh*t-crazy manifestation of Islam known as the Islamic State and crew.

    Of course, Islam is still Islam. But having a ready example of how nutty it can be may be more useful than we think.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service