When Green Dreams Beget Brown Nightmares
show comments
  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    And to top it all off “Global Warming” is the greatest hoax in history.

  • Boritz

    Greens claim they are against dirty energy and for clean energy. The truth is they are against energy that is affordable, dense and continuously available whether it is dirty (hydrocarbons that are liquid at STP) or rather clean such as gas.

  • Rick Johnson

    The Greens do not care about the environment. They seek an anti-industrial revolution. Destroying our ability to produce cheap energy is a key part of that plan. If you look at their antics through from this perspective, it all makes sense.

    • Ken G

      Spot on.

    • Despiser_of_Libs

      Green is nothing but the “new red”…

      • Rick Johnson

        Marx and the communists were pro-growth and pro-industry.

        The Greens are anti-prosperity. That’s the important difference.

  • ddh

    Solar power was a particularly inappropriate technology for Germany, given its cloudy weather and peak demand for energy during the dark northern winter.

    Also, if you are going to italicize Energiewende as a foreign word, please note that German capitalizes all nouns.

  • Despiser_of_Libs

    Liberalism makes smart people do really DUMB things…

    No amount of education can overcome Liberal stupidity…

  • George Purcell

    Ever single element of this was both predicable and predicted.

  • GlobalTrvlr

    The costs are even higher than what you have shown. For instance, when they shut down the nuclear plants, (and we are doing the same with both coal & nuclear in the US), you have written off the useful life of that asset, damaging the company & shareholders. Especially for nuclear, there are still a lot of ongoing costs to either bring the plant down to a certain level with the expectation that people may come to their senses and want to restart the plants, or to totally decommission the plants. These are enormous costs that need to be counted when totaling up the cost benefit of going “green”.

    Then, along with the fact that nuclear and coal plants are “base load” plants, good for 7x24x365, what they also provide is the system stability – the fact that when you plug something in you can rely on the frequency to be between 49.9 and 50.1 Hz. Even when you have large load impacts or rejections, or the load swings throughout the day. In order to replace the “big iron” stability aspects, now utilities and grid operators have to buy synchronous condensers, and other power system stabilizer equipment that they did not need when they had generators online. Germany has been spending in the $1B per year range on these, as has Denmark and other countries that ran headlong into the green initiative.

    An analogy would be this. The new Boeing Dreamliner uses two jet engines rated about 100,000 HP. A decent size coal fired generator is about 6x that and a nuclear 10x that. A wind turbine is about 1-3MW. So, retiring a coal fired generator and replacing it with a wind turbines is essentially like taking of the two engines of a Boeing Dreamiliner and strapping on 6,000 Beechcraft propeller engines to the plane, and then trying to fly it. Not very stable, and getting them all to work together is impossible. Oh, and the plane won’t fly about 40% of the time due to lack of fuel. That is how going to renewables is screwing up the electrical systems, and why there are hidden costs in the $10x B’s.

    Another hidden cost are the new interconnects between countries, many of them very long and underwater – very expensive. It is the only way that they can keep the lights on is to rely on others to have some power when they don’t.

    Quite a mess, that most people do not have a clue about.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.