The Battle for Ukraine
Ukrainian Oligarch Says No to Secession
show comments
  • lukelea

    Off topic, but it is a little disquieting to see how a few “oligarchs” in the Ukraine, just as in Russia, somehow managed to amass the lion’s share of the capital wealth of these societies in just a few years after the collapse of communism, so that it is now, legally at least, “their” wealth.

    What does that mean? My suggestion: it means that it is not really “theirs” in any absolute sense; rather they are its managers only, which they manage for the benefit of the larger society (societies?) to which they belong. The capital itself is too sacred to own in any personal way: it is the accumulated crime and sacrifice of centuries, plus interest.

    • Andrew Allison

      I had no idea that you were a closet communist [/grin ]. Of course it’s obscene that the post-Soviet oligarchs managed to accumulate so much wealth, but when a power structure collapses, the assets ge to the ruthless. I submit that, to paraphrase a well-worn US cliche, their wealth will be pried from their cold dead hands and, as the post demonstrates, they have a lot of power at their disposal — in this case doing what the Ukraine government was incapable of. When you get right down to it, the difference between the Soviet and post-Soviet environments is that the oligarchs succeeded in monetizing the assets they stole from the people.

      • lukelea

        To clarify, Corlyss and Andrew, my point (part of it) is that those who can manage these capital assets most efficiently are the ones who end up controlling it, which is not a bad thing. They account for the “plus interest” part of capital, which is just as important as the crime and the sacrifice.

        That is what makes capitalism unique: it redeems the evil of the past by turning it into something good, or at least potentially good.

        But to make that potential actual requires good social policy. Wage subsidies (an improved version of the earned income tax credit) financed by a global graduated expenditure tax on the wealthy would bring about a more equitable distribution, not of income itself, which isn’t the most important thing, but of consumption, which is.

        • Andrew Allison

          Sorry, but I must disagree. My point was, and is, that when things are in a state of flux, the astute and/or ruthless always take the lion’s share, regardless of their ability to manage the assets which they have acquired (Capitalism at is worst). History (I think) tells us that capitalism constrained by social responsibility is thewinning strategy.
          I fear that I must also disagree with your prescription for social policy. I’m all in favor of a tax on consumption, as long as it is applied to everybody, not just “the wealthy” (I’m particularly incensed by the tax ACA imposes on the middle class). There are two ways to achieve this: sales tax or a value added tax, The latter has the benefit of actually representing value added, but the drawback (as illustrated by the countries which have adopted it) of being an all-too-easy way of increasing tax revenue. Wouldn’t a flat tax on income and a tax on consumption be a better approach.

    • Corlyss

      “What does that mean? My suggestion: it means that it is not really “theirs” in any absolute sense;”

      Luke,
      Are you serious? Can anyone off the street walk in and collect any of the $$$ in the oligarch’s pot. I bet not. Besides, whose more likely to do something significant for the society with the money in oligarchs hands outside the failed states all over the world? Certainly not “the people.”

  • Pete

    “If one of the world’s richest men stands to lose in a big way, Putin’s gambit to create a failed state directly to his west is much less likely to succeed.”

    A childish conclusion.

    One man can be blown away by a gust of wind.

    • Corlyss

      Some of the resident scholars’ posts here get sillier by the day.

    • Felix Keverich

      Just wait until Russia cuts off gas supply in June. These steelworkers will be instantly out of work…

  • Corlyss

    How many guns do the steel workers have?

  • tolar cav

    Oh… such a LIE….
    The real thing is…
    Thousands of steelworkers fanned out on Thursday through the city of Mariupol, establishing control over the streets and banishing the Pro-Ukranian militants…

    They are pro-russian…..

  • tolar cav
  • GeorgeWashington

    So is anybody with right mind and some functioning brain who still believes what US media says? Only if he/she is an idiot or just a natural hater LOL

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.