Spreading Freedom
WRM in the WSJ : How to Promote Democracy
show comments
  • Andrew Allison

    I question the thesis that spreading democracy around the world is a good thing — consider the track record of such efforts. History, ancient and modern, suggests that “tribal” (by which I mean ethnic, religious and cultural) enmity can only be kept under control by repression. The death of Tito in 1980, for example, lead to a bloodbath in the Balkans, and the Levant is currently awash in blood which can be attributed to the spread of “democracy”.

  • gmcinva

    Perhaps we would be better served to work toward preserving freedom in our own republic. We seem to be having considerable difficulty in maintaining or restoring the rule of law and a respect for private property as well as other previously respected freedoms in our own country. If we can or will solve those issues, then we might be more able to promote “democracy” to others without attempting to impose same on cultures that do not want it.

    • Kavanna

      You know, this is why I come here. I loaded this page thinking I would write something like this, only to discover that WRM’s super-smart fans have, once again, beaten me to it. Clearly, we need to stage a virtual sit-in and occupy Prof. Mead’s cyberoffice 🙂

      Liberal democracy begins at home, and we are losing it, here at home.

  • Bruce

    2013 was a bad year for democracy in the USA as well as the usurper president was not challenged by the “opposition” party as he governed by executive order. The usurper does not like our Constitution and feels we should not be able to keep it.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.