Finding the Via Media Online after the NSA Leaks
show comments
  • Andrew Allison

    Oh dear, not a good day for VM analysis. NSA’s remit is FOREIGN intelligence, and while monitoring the telephone or Internet communication of a foreigner visiting the US is OK, vacuuming up everything produced by US citizens is not! It is, in fact, a blatant violation of our First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. FWIW, I’ve appended the following signature to my email correspondence:
    “Ask not for whom the NSA trolls, it trolls for thee!
    (my make-work treat for the surveillance State)”

  • jeburke

    I see a really big irony here: the people most exercised about the potential to encroach on somebody’s internet privacy include that loose association of hackers (!) around Wikileaks who make it their business to hack into anyone else’s stuff and then crow about it; self-appointed snoops who steal other people’s internet communications; and editors and reporters who are always ready to publish those stolen communications as long as it furthers some cause or grinds some axe they favor.

    But let’s not sit idly by and allow NSA to figure out out to read al Qaeda’s mail, encrypted and protected free of charge by Google. Can’t have that.

  • Corlyss

    “But now there’s no excuse for ignorance anymore (not that there ever was much to begin with).”
    Agreed. I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me why this is considered “news” when most of these facts were known or or about 2006 when the NYT et al. broke the story of the phone companies’ cooperation with the feds on access to the phone cos.’ records, which just happened to consist of everything that travelled over their infrastructure. Why this is a surprise to anyone is still a mystery to me. Now with Google saying categorically that gmail emails are their property and not secure, well, that’s icing on the snooping cake. The lesson from this is people have no more expectation of privacy in their emails than they do to something spray painted on the sides of their houses or said in public to an audience. Will that change the behavior that has evolved over the last 30 years of email acclimatization? I doubt it. People who don’t care about sexting and posting minute by minute reports on their whereabouts and their activities on Facebook shouldn’t get their shorts in a twist over other people reading their email.

  • bpuharic

    Actually this is pretty old news.”Scientific American” has had news several years ago about cryptographic techniques that are unbreakable, and how the NSA has worked with manufacturers to ensure they’ll always have access.

  • mgoodfel

    What NSA is doing is very short-sighted. Yes, we all knew they tried to break codes. What we didn’t know is that they deliberately subverted the standards and co-opted the carriers to make sure that codes were easier to break. And there will be obvious repercussions.

    First, terrorists will just meet face to face and not use the net. I doubt we’re doing to be able to infiltrate those groups, so they are going to go completely dark.

    Second, other governments, knowing these holes have been built into our security, will try and find their way into the NSA-built back doors.

    Third, the techies will work on really good end to end encryption that has not had any government involvement in standard setting. NSA has now lost the trust of a big chunk of the security community, and made itself enemy #1 for a lot of hackers.

    In other words, the situation could end up far worse for national security than if they’d stuck to their legal mission.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.