What Did Israel’s Bombing of Syria Mean?
Published on: May 17, 2013
show comments
  • WigWag

    “White House spokesman Josh Earnest curtly put it in answer to a question, “we’re in very close touch” with Israel “on a range of issues.” Very little mention has been made of the U.S. reaction here, but for those in the region the silence was deafening. Administration signals are either all over the place or no place at all on Syria, Iran, Russia, the IRS, the Justice Department AP caper, pending immigration reform legislation and more besides; but on Israel the signals are consistent and unmistakable.” ( Adam Garfinkle)

    Is this another example of the new Obama Doctrine entitled “Leading from Behind?”

  • It seems to me that the Sunnis, if they succeed will butcher the Alawis as a matter of priority and not be in any mood to tolerate the Druze or the Christians. Do all these people flee to Lebanon or try to? Or can Assad maintain an enclave effectively? I know no one knows the answers to these questions, but in some ways the current deadlock seems remaining in place seems better than outright victory by either side.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.