How Can China Fix its Colossal Environmental Problems?
show comments
  • It’s an interesting thought, but encouraging telework in an economy that’s still so focused on manufacturing would be putting the cart before the horse. China would do better to simply mandate tighter emissions standards. That would drive up the cost of gasoline, which would cut down on the number of people driving and the number of hours they can afford to spend doing it. That in turn would improve urban air quality, reduce traffic, and save lives.

    • Clayton Holbrook

      Mandating tighter emission standards gets to the delicate balancing act that is mentioned in the post. W/o widespread technological improvement that offers drivers an affordable lower emission vehicle it could hurt the economy and make the single-party system seem less favorable in the eyes of a population with ever increasing lifestyle demands. Vehicle emissions standards could be gradually implemented with emission reductions overtime, but is that enough w/o over regulating?

      You make a good point in regards to the state of the Chinese economy being more manufacturing based and telework be not so plausible, but in the last paragraph WRM seems to suggest that they look at the overall structure of their economy. Maybe it’s about time China start looking into a more post-industrial economy. That alone would reduce industrial emissions while addressing the notion that a developed country can’t rely on industrialism alone in the 21st century. A structural perspective, as opposed to quick fix standards delaying needed economic diversity and reform for many reasons.

      • Good points all, but I think China’s current model for creating income growth has already hit a wall regardless of environmental standards. There’s only so much that competing on low regulation and low cost of labor can get a country, and China has ridden that strategy more or less exactly as far as it can take them. Indonesia and Vietnam are more than happy to compete with China on that field, and huge swaths of the developing world are already lined up behind even them, patiently waiting their turn.

        • Christopher Anderson

          The Chinese economy will do fine. We’re going to see slower growth. But household registration reform will happen. This will encourage migrant workers to consume more.

          We’re probably also going to see land reform. Individuals with rural household registration, I believe, are already allowed to sell their land in Chongqing. If scaled up, this will create real efficiencies in agriculture. It also pads the growth figures because you’re eliminating subsistance production that isn’t really measured.

  • Douglas6

    The Party floated a rumor a few months ago about moving the capital of China to somewhere else, probably a small city in the western part of China, since the congestion and pollution problems of Beijing are otherwise probably unsolvable. China has had many capitals over the centuries, so there’s plenty of precedent for a move. This rumor appears to have been a trial balloon – it’s not clear what, if anything, will happen next.

  • Anthony

    “China must move away from energy intensive industries like manufacturing.” The one problem with this is that other countries will begin generating massive amounts of pollution when industry moves elsewhere. Many environmentalists in the west like to congratulate themselves on how much less pollution there is in the west compared to the recent past. They don’t talk about the fact that all of that pollution isn’t gone. It’s been moved to other countries, so it isn’t as much of a victory for mother nature as some people think.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.