Beijing Steps up Persecution of Muslims in Xinjiang
show comments
  • Luke Lea

    We in the West are informed (by our mainstream media) that China’s violent subjugation of Tibet is the big moral issue. But in China itself (and for those in the know) Xinjiang is on a par with Tibet both morally and politically. Peter Hessler writes well about it in his book Country Driving.

  • Cyclopps

    China is at the very least is trying to do SOMETHING about the social cancer that muslames are. We should take a lesson and pay attention to what the Chinese are doing or before long, we will end up like France or Britain.
    Get rid of the Petri dish and you will get rid of the problem.

  • the Han people can be arrogant and intolerant. When the try to suppress Christianity, my sympathies are with the Christians, and when they try to suppress Tibetan Buddhism, my sympathies are with the Tibetans.

    But, the only people in the world more arrogant and intolerant than the Han, are the Muslims. Until such time, if ever, as all Muslims are ready to stand up and say that all religions should be treated with respect by all Muslims, my sympathies are with the Chinese government.

  • Leo

    Isn’t this sort of rubbish what groups like Al-Qaeda were founded to stop? Where are they?

  • Gary G

    It would seem that the Chinese are only preventing the Muslims from preventing anyone else from practicing their religion and dominating everything with our own religion.

    It would seem that the Muslim should not complain until such time as they allowed people to practice ever on religion in whatever country they are and including Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and so on.

    The people who practice Islam are oppressive. They should not complain if people return the favor.

  • Communism and Islamism are both totalist world views. They cannot co-exist indefinitely. Islamism slept in Russia apparently for decades but when the domination of the state waned it reemerged. Is there a difference between Islamism and moderate islam? Well, yes – I know moderates, but they are silenced and marginalized by the raving totalitarians. Stalin moved or slaughtered whole populations, but the Chinese method, as seen in Tibet, is to settle the ethnically split region with large numbers of Han Chinese immigrants. That would seem to be an effective way to suppress Uighur ‘splitism’. As to the West, it is being colonized by immigration and does not even recognize it. To totalists, tolerance is weakness.

  • Raball

    Yes, the nice thing about the Communists is that they are willing to persecute anyone regardsless of race, religion or politics. The give the same brutal-handed treatment to those in Xinjiang, Tibet and other regions. Unless you are part of one of the phoney churches you’ll get it too. Speak out in their version of Twitter (the real one is banned) and you get a visit from a guy with a trunchon….Am I the only one who feels like this is Japan in the 30’s all over again?

  • Ghandigee

    For your reading list, see also “Limp Pigs and the Five Ring Circus”

    [Summary]…If the Beijing Olympics convinced you China is changing…think on this If it was, would China’s media police have tried to airbrush from existence every less-than complimentary reference to the Olympic facilities? If it was, would the government have introduced transparency legislation then ban the press from writing about it? If it was, would China have asked the author to help turn its propaganda machine into respected news agency then ignore all transformation advice? Seven years of broken promises and mental torture at the hands of the masters of the machine left Mark Newham seeking psychiatric help. Eventually he fled, convinced the system is in need of similar treatment. To those taken in by the great Changing China deception, he says this. Don’t believe everything you read about China. Change in the People’s Republic is the equivalent of turning your underpants inside out. It might look like they’ve been changed but they’re still the same pair of underpants….

  • teapartydoc

    In order to be successful, leftism, the Blue Model, requires a great deal of homogeneity in politics, culture, economics, well just about everything, and this homogeneity must be enforced. Diversity kills leftism. This is why we see false claims of diversity while a rigid conformity in political correctness and ideological consanguinity are the rule on our big box industrially designed schools and college campuses. The homogeneity is most easily enforced by attacking those elements of society that are least able to mount an effective opposition. This is the method the fascist Blue Modellers of Europe used as did their Communist Blue Modelling counterparts.

  • Unfortunately, the kind of crude suppression that China is currently trying against all forms of Islam, however moderate and peaceful,. . .
    That’s the first lie. Islam is one. It is a world-dominant ideology, not a religion. It is at real and physical war with the rest of the world. It does not seek peaceful converts or harmony, it seeks one way and accepts no other, and only at the point of a sword or gun do they reconcile with the the “unbeliever.”

    I’d say the Chinese know EXACTLY what they’re doing: defending their nation from usurpers.

    Forcing children to eat candy isn’t exactly the same as suicide bombing them into submission. It’s not a lovely or laudable thing, but let’s have some modicum of correlation here. As long as the assumption is supported that Islam is a “faith” there is no way to combat it. Period. Talk it any which way you want to: if it’s a faith, and that’s the subtle beauty of well-crafted Lie, then you cannot take up arms against it until it first strikes at you. All well and good until their first strike is atomic.

    It’s all so reasonable until it isn’t.

  • Eric Blair

    I disagree that China “doesn’t know what it’s doing” in Xinjiang. It’s not pretty, and it sucks to be a Uighur there right now, but the goal is quite obvious; The Chinese gov’t is intent on changing the Muslim culture of the Uighurs to something subservient and amenable to the rest of China.

  • Karl Schmidt

    While I disagree on with what China is doing – it is interesting to note that the intent is actually positive. They are trying to unify the public – unlike both the Republicans and Democrats here working to split the public by giving special rights to special groups in exchange for votes.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.