Drugs, Terrorists, Locusts: What to Do about Mali?
show comments
  • Anthony

    What a mess…. And to think this is a consequence of our international stated desire to preclude Libyan deaths in the tens of thousands – although the Syrian crisis appears potentially more lethal. By the way WRM, I select a of your four options, with stipulations if permitted.

  • Andrew Allison

    How many Iraqs, Afghanistans, Libyas (cause of the troubles in Mali), etc., will it take to learn not to intervene at all. CSM has a good analysis at http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Keep-Calm/2012/0727/Good-Reads-Mali-jihadis-and-the-consequences-of-military-intervention.

  • So doesn’t matter.

  • Dutch 1960

    One of mankind’s conceits is that there are always good answers to the questions–prescriptions for the problems.

    Good luck on this one. With extended family members born and resident in Mali, I can tell you that the local reaction is the French way (as France colonized and dominated the region for so long): throw your hands in the air and say “so sad, what can be done?”. Then passively wait it out until things play out as they do. The forces involved in playing it out will be external (Al queda, the Tuoraegs, possibly France or the US, and maybe China). The locals are along for the ride and will bend to whichever way the wind blows. That is how they got into this mess in the first place. The “coup” was an action of comically minimal proportions.

    Read VS Naipaul’s “A Bend in the River” for insight. The locals will mostly not be driven to take sides, but the very few, along with the outsiders who have moved in, will wreak havoc before it is over.

  • Government Drone

    Would have staying out of Libya have made things any better for Mali? Khaddafi used a fair number of Tuareg men as mercenaries to fight off the rebellion. Absent any major Western intervention in Libya that rebellion would’ve lasted longer, regardless of the eventual winner. Which means there would have been very likely MORE armed Tuareg running around, & hardly likely to be more loyal to the Malian government.

    The best we could’ve hoped for in that situation would be a northern Mali rebellion that felt strong enough not to invite Islamists in to “help”. And which could have still fallen to them anyway.

    That’s my opinion, at any rate. YMMV.

  • State failure does not occur overnight, and it has not in Mali. Likewise, the unintended consequence of Gaddafi’s fall is only a proximate cause of Mali’s collapse.

    Agreed, there are no good options now. Part of the solution, though, may lie in helping locals oust Ansar Dine. Much of the Islamists’ agenda is not popular with northerners.

  • Jim.

    How come so many of these articles on Mali and Libya don’t mention Algeria? It’s not like Libya borders Mali.

  • Mr Three Names

    I select the choice you have push polled (e).

    The Malians are too weak take back the north alone. Niger and Nigeria are motivated and the US is coming to the conclusion an Al Qaeda state in North Mali is not desirable. The French are leading this in many ways, which would normally be a cause to doubt but the French are not to be trifled with in this part of the world, remember Operation Licorne? The UNSC will be presided over by the French in August, a vote of force will be on the agenda. Now, how will the Russians and Chinese vote?

  • Kris
© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.