Syria: More Bloodshed, No Invasion
show comments
  • thibaud

    Boy, that one was a tough call. Brilliantly played.

    Perhaps VM could apply its insight and expertise to something a bit more, er, challenging?

    What’s the VM call on whether there will be a strike on Iran before year end?

    How about telling us what the Obama admin should do wrt Iran?

  • Agreed. I think this is a really good demonstration of the way international institutions operate to both empower and constrain states. Turkey is able to make a credible threat of force given its NATO membership, but the fact that it has to consult with its alliance partners as well as take the EU into consideration hampers its ability to respond in any way that it sees fit. Contrast this to a country like Israel, which does not have the same constraints but is also more isolated.
    http://ottomansandzionists.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/a-brief-thought-experiment-on-turkey-and-syria-and-what-comes-next/

  • Ed Snyder

    You’re kidding, right? Or is this a case of wishful thinking? Because the Turks don’t seem to be looking at it that way. From the link:

    ISTANBUL—Turkey raised the stakes in a confrontation over a military jet shot down by Syria on Friday, saying the plane was over international waters when the incident took place—contrary to accounts by Damascus. Ankara also said it plans to formally consult with its allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization on how to respond.

  • Cunctator

    I hope that Washington reacts to the Turkish request for support with the same approach that Anakara took in 2003 and says “no”. Let the Turks stew in their own problems. We, the West, have nothing to gain by helping Erdogan advance his regional agenda.

    Moreover, a NATO intervention in Syria would be a serious distraction from the main security threat to the West emanating from the MidEast, namely Iran. Taking out the Assad regime will not solve the problem of Iran or its pursuit of nukes, but it will set back the clock in dealing with that issue — and thereby give Tehran more time to acquire nukes. Going after Iran will, however, elimninate an important perhaps the most important support for the Syrian regime.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.