Kickstarting the Jobs of the Future
show comments
  • Proud to be the first Via Meadia enthusiast (as far as I know– hopefully there are more) to have completed a project using Kickstarter funds!!

    Thanks for spotlighting Kickstarter Prof Mead.

  • There will always be enough jobs. The issue is wages.

  • thibaud

    “raising an eye-popping $10 million last Friday”

    Is this a joke? There’s several billion in venture money invested each year, and almost as much invested by friends & family / angel investors. $10 million is equivalent to a drop in Lake Michigan.

    Put it another way, Kickstarter is to innovation and economic growth as a neighborhood talent competition is to arts and culture.

    Sorry to blow up the unicorns of the government-haters here, but if you want to have a serious impact on innovation, productivity and growth – especially in the really crucial, capital-intensive, research-driven areas of the economy such as energy and transportation – it won’t come from cheap gimmicks like KS.

    And it won’t occur without significant government intervention across the full spectrum, from massive funding for basic research in nanoscience etc, to ensuring liquidity for capital markets, to providing large markets for early-stage products when research comes out of the lab….

    in his desperation to find evidence that Big Gum’mint is on its death-bed, the author merely shows yet again that he doesn’t really understand how big economies grow bigger. One way or another, big government is essential for the really big innovations that will determine whether we grow at 1% or 2-3% annually over the next 30 years.

  • Jacksonian Libertarian

    New job opportunity; The Rock Star Professor selling on-line classes.
    Gold (500,000 Classes sold)
    Platinum (1,000,000 Classes sold)
    Diamond (10,000,000 Classes sold)

  • Mike Britti

    Thibaud goes from mildly interesting point to wild non sequitur. The author is not a government hater (have you actually bothered to read his stuff?). The point is that innovation and growth require a vigorous private sector. Government, good government, helps create the conditions for high growth by providing as little oversight as is possible (the Jeffersonian ideal of the government that governs best governs least). Government does not create anything, it uses resources. Private industry will pull us out of the current doldrums if we have the smarts to let it happen.

  • thibaud

    “Government does not create anything”

    You’re seriously misinformed. ‘Twas government created that magical network that you and I are chatting on right now. It was government that provided the initial markets for nearly all of the core technological breakthroughs of the last century.

    DoD is government. DARPA is government.

    MIT, Stanford, Cal Tech and 100 other powerhouse research labs and institutes across this nation are funded in large measure by our government.

    I could go on, but this whole discussion is gone from the absurd to fairyland. As if a BS penny-provider to makers of timewasters and other digital hula-hoops is going to produce the next Intel and “produce a strong middle class” employing ~100 million people in high paid occupations Yup.

  • Kickstarter is a proof of concept that government has already tried to emulate in the JOBS Bill. Essentially it is crowdsourcing innovation. BTW Kickstarter is NOT an investment scheme. You will get a Pebble watch if and when the company successfully produces them for your money. It is even less than a drop in the bucket at this point. As I understand it, the JOBS bill was inspired by Kickstarter, and intentionally clears away the legal underbrush that forces Kickstarter to NOT operate as a small investor venture capital organization. Under the law as it stood you have to be a legally qualified investor – read big time – to invest in such high risk schemes. The JOBS bill sets up some rules – I don’t know exactly what they are – to empower small investors to collectively invest in high risk start ups and also give them some protection. It’s a first try – nothing more. Significantly, in my opinion It also relieves the new companies of the requirements of Sarbanes Oxley – I’ve read that, without that provision, SOX would cost these startups a million a year to comply from the git go.

    Because Europeans can’t invest legally in Kickstarter projects, they have started their own versions. As I said it is a crowdsourcing model and I think it is important because it disintermediates ‘big money’ whether it be banks, government, angel investors or venture capitalists. In some ways the idea is not so new. Here in Australia there is a tradition of offering stock on the ASX at much lower prices per share than in the US – a dollar more or less for perfectly good companies – precisely so ordinary people can invest.

    I don’t know how this will work out, but I am sure that the Kickstarter model looks promising. The old system is breaking down and we need to build new systems. One of the things common to the old Iron Triangle (Big busniness, government and labor) is that they are all trying to hold onto their variously obsolete business models. eg Cell phone companies resist anything that would allow Wi FI technologies to disrupt their mobile cash cow (In America too many of you are paying most of $100 a month to them while in Australia I pay $10 for all I need and $20 if I need significantly more.) VOIP has already slaughtered the old phone company cash cow here and in the US. . I remember when I thought $50 a month for international calls back to my rellies in the US was a great deal. Now, I pay about a penny a minute to landline phones from here. Otherwise I Skype for free.

    We get a glimpse of big government hanging onto its business model by charging an exit tax to some of the Facebook early investors (including Zuck who I believe is a citizen of Singapore) who have opted to give up their US citizenship like athletic stars used to flee high tax countries when European tax rates were very high. I recall Bjorn Borg did this and was fleeced by friends and had to go back to Sweden broke. Somehow I don’t think Zuck will will come crawling back to Uncle Sam. I also notice that Apple has a hundred million overseas that it can’t bring back to the US because it would cost them 30% corporate tax. I include that last as an example of how bad tax policy is gumming up our most successful company.

    I think there is a role for government but I see no way that the US government is going to allow itself to be shrunk. It is very hard to separate the legitimate and necessary functions of government from the barnacles that have attached themselves to the ship of state. Big government will grab for all the money it can get its hands on to keep the barnacles in the style to which they have become accustomed. What they can’t get from taxes they will print. .

    Finally the pension crisis in the various states often discussed here on Via Media is caused by the breakdown in the big labor business model which has been skillful at using its political clout to obtain excellent pension and other benefits. I think an unintended consequence of Prop 13 in California was to enhance the teacher’s union business model by allowing them to bargain with a ‘single provider’ in Sacramento.

    I think there is a critical difference between the Keynesian idea of deficit spending to smooth out the ups and downs of the economy and government trying maintain itself by printing money. At some point stimulus turns into extend and pretend. If Sarbains Oxley was the ‘accountants and lawyers welfare act’ then the stimulus may well have been the barnacle welfare act.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.