Rahm Takes on the Blue Model
show comments
  • WigWag

    It could be an important political trend to watch, but there is no compelling evidence that it will help kids or improve schools. It might; it might not. More likely it will have no effect whatsoever.

  • Tom

    I am an inner city public school teacher. I teach refugee and immigrant children. Usually traumatized if not victimized. And, not wholly in disagreement with you. However, that being said, the canary in the coal mine is ‘no more teachers’. While not a pressing problem now in a bad economy, as soon as there is a turn around they numbers of people enetring the field will dwindle, as it did throughout the 90’s and 00’s. Try this experiment for the next week: ask every teenager or young adult in college you meet if they would be interested in a teaching career in an inner city urban high school. I doubt you get even one answer in the affirmative. It’s a job no one wants and if they do take it they generally leave the profession early. It generally takes three years to learn the trade and become proficient at it. Anyway, the canary in the coal mine!

  • Tom

    Please pardon the typing errors above. I am a child of the mid twenieth century and typing on a ‘telephone’ is beyond my late baby boomer capabilities. And, there is no spellcheck!

  • Kenny

    Mr. Mead,

    For what it’s worth: I read your piece ‘Liberalism on Life Support” in The american interest. Those who responed to you — especially Gary (“Monkey business”) Hart didn’t lay a glove on your hypothesis.

    And speaking of the demise of the blue model, which is your favorite topics, V. Inozemtsev, writing in the same issue of TAI, has a key insight. He writes that, for democracy to continue, the ‘franchise should be pared back.’ Amen!

    Yes sir, that Ruskie has it right, Mr. Mead. U.S. society cannot affort to continue to let morons, illiterates, and parasites to vote. As was said, too much democracy, will kill the social conditions that make a functioning democracy possible.

  • Kris

    WigWag, I agree with you that quite a lot of the blame (responsibility) can be laid on parents. But that of course raises the question: if schools accomplish so little, why are we spending so much on them?

    Tom, as a perhaps unwelcome buttress to your point: Ed schools tend to have shockingly low entrance requirements. This would seem to imply that they cannot get a sufficient number of qualified applicants. (Obligatory disclaimer: there are, of course, many talented and devoted techers out there.)

  • There would be no teacher’s shortage at all, and we could get a much bigger pool of potential teachers if we did away with the silly notion that “education degrees” were the only degrees that allowed one to teach. We’ve locked out a significant number of the workforce with this silly rule and lost much in subject competency.

    I’m here, willing and able, and believe it or not, would prefer an inner city teaching job. I have a bachelor degree in English. I can’t get hired because I don’t have an “education degree.” I could get one in 18 months for $10,000 more dollars if I could afford it (I can’t), but I would just have to follow it up with another 18 month master’s degree program and another $10,000 to keep my certification. It’s a racket.

    Let talented people teach and break the unions, and half our problems in education disappear.

  • Annabellep, You are so right. I have tried to find out what my husband, an electrical engineer of 25 years who was a physics grader and a chemistry tutor in college, would have to do to become a high school math or physics teacher. I can’t find the exact requirements – Wisconsin apparently does not have set standards – but whatever it is, he would have to return to school for a while. At the high school level, shouldn’t we be concerned about having teachers who know the material more than about teachers who know how to make sure kindergartners are playing together properly?

    There would be no teacher shortage (not that there is – 700 applicants per position in WI recently) if professionals could transition to teaching easily.

  • XTeacher

    I doubt the path for fast track teacher certificationfor people already holding degrees is as gloomy as
    annabellep and The gold digger state. Try Teach for America- but it is difficult to get in.

    I would suggest that prospective teachers try substitute teaching for a while.

  • Government ‘education’ is the problem. The free market is the solution. Everything else i self-serving opportunism.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.