Iran Talks Fail
show comments
  • Kohl Haas

    With the same logic as Pascal’s Wager, the one man in all the world you must believe and not question is the man who says he wants to kill you.

  • Corlyss

    Since they were smart enough to help get Obama elected (by making things so unpleasant in Iraq after Bush had a significant failure of nerve in 2003), you’d think they’d be smart enough to stay quiet until after “their boy” is re-elected.

  • Toni

    Like I said, Iran has played for time since its nuke program was revealed in 2002.

    “Iran said today that it would consider granting more access to inspectors. ”We are studying positively the appeal by the International Atomic Energy Agency to sign an additional protocol,” Khalil Mousavi, a spokesman for Iran’s atomic energy agency, told The Associated Press.

    “Diplomats were skeptical that the shift in Iran’s position was genuine.” – NYT 6/18/2003

    Still waiting for Via Meadia’s assessment of Iran’s real intent and future behavior.

  • Cunctator

    How can anyone be surprised by the outcome of the IAEA’s latest contact with Iran? The approach, taking its lead from Washington, was always doomed to fail. The Iranian leadership knows exactly who they are dealing with, and how utterly spineless the West is.

    For years, knowledgeable people have been saying Iran has a nuclear weapons programme: and for as many years, there have been enough less-informed talking heads saying “no, there is no proof” or, as in the 2007 NIE, deliberately lying about what is going on to advance a personal agenda. All the time, evidence accumulated until, finally, last November the IAEA (admittedly under more competent leadership) released a report that said what needed to be voiced — Iran is hiding a great deal of its nuclear activities and doing so, most likely, for very worrying reasons.

    However, by then, political change in the US had brought to office an administration that is openly pro-Muslim, led by a president whose past associates include vicious anti-semites (Rev. Wright) and left-leaning radicals who are more critical of America than of America’s foes.

    So, out of this ghastly mix, you get a US policy of appeasing Iran and more concerned with restraining Israel (regardless of what happens). Iran knows this, and so can quite confidently ignore the IAEA and any other diplomatic pressure. Sanctions might have worked ten years ago, but now Iran probably feels it is so close to success that the regime can weather the economic difficulties. So that policy also will fail. Nothing at all surprising.

    One would have took far and wide for such appalling political leadership as we in the West have had to endure on this issue for the past few years. For many reasons, Americans will come to regret electing Obama, and his policy on the Iranian nuclear issue will figure prominently among them.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.