mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Shale Going Global?
New Report: Crude Exports Good for America

Opening up American crude for exports into the global oil market could boost domestic production by more than one million barrels per day, and would create or support nearly one million jobs in just four years, according to a new report from the energy consulting group IHS. The FT reports:

IHS argued that allowing exports would improve the fit between crude production and refining capacity in the US, and narrow the price differential between US oil benchmarks and their internationally traded counterparts, helping production companies to expand their output by an average of 1.2m b/d during 2016-30.

The consultancy also suggested that allowing crude exports would create or support almost 1m jobs by 2018, and have a modest downward effect on US retail petrol prices.

Energy guru Daniel Yergin, vice-chairman of IHS, noted that the ban on crude oil exports has become something of an anachronism:

[Yergin] said the export ban first introduced in 1975 had made sense only to support the US oil price controls of the 1970s, but had been redundant for decades since those controls were abolished in 1981.

There are many factors to consider before deciding to open up our country’s suddenly flush domestic oil market to the rest of the world; it’s a complicated matter. This new report sets out a bullish case for major energy policy change, but the politics of such a shift are bound to be tricky. The Energy Information Administration is planning a new series on the topic, and you can expect this debate to heat up as we approach this fall’s midterm elections. In the furor that’s sure to follow, keep this in mind: this is surely the kind of problem we’d like to have.

Features Icon
show comments
  • S.C. Schwarz

    You must be kidding. With Obama as president there is zero chance this will happen. Jobs, economics, science are all irrelevant. The greens will go ballistic and the greens are a key democratic interest group.

  • brianmacker

    Creating “one million jobs” temporarily exporting crude is not neccesarily “good for America”. It can only be proven good if all internal artificial government restraints and subsidies on the market are removed. We may not export a drop of oil under free market conditions, which would prove it is NOT good for america to export.

  • docscience

    Export of value-added finished petroleum fuels like gasoline, kerosene and diesel would be even better.

    But that would require new refineries, and we know that can’t happen in Obama’s America.

  • dude1394

    I agree docscience. I would think that chemicals, petroleum products is a much better use of this commodity. I continue to be against exporting LNG at all as that is an obvious competitive advantage to the chemical industry.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service