mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Uber Alles? Nein!
Berlin Kicks Uber to the Curb

Are you in the German capital and in need a ride? If you do, you can forget about using Uber. The popular San Francisco-based taxi-service app is getting the boot from Berlin. Bloomberg has the story:

Uber Technologies Inc. has been banned by a Berlin court from providing taxi services via its smartphone software, in a sign the rebellion by local chauffeurs to the U.S. company’s business model in Europe is growing. […]

Uber hurt competition by violating rules that force limousine drivers to return to their base after delivering customers, the Berlin Taxi Association said in a statement on its website. The Berlin district court confirmed that it had issued an interim injunction valid for the state of Berlin following the request of a single taxi driver.

“Whereas Parisian taxi drivers have demolished the odd Uber limousine for reasons of competition, this brave Berlin taxi entrepreneur has chosen to use the legal means he is entitled to,” the association said.

The taxi group cited investments by Google Inc. (GOOG) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. as a sign that Uber, valued at about $3.5 billion, is acting deliberately in violating local rules.

“The only thing these companies care for is maintaining the old, blocking the new, preventing more people from having more choice, failing consumers and their own drivers,” Uber said.

Uber is facing opposition from taxi services across Europe, and the bureaucrats have backed the taxis. In Brussels, where the government sets the price of fares, Uber is now fined €10,000 anytime a driver without a taxi license is hailed via the app. A Belgian court imposed the fine after Taxi Verts, one of the only two chauffeur businesses in the city, alleged “unfair competition” against the American start-up. France came up with different way to level the playing field. A new regulation from Paris forces Uber drivers to wait 15 minutes before picking up customers, even if those customers are only a block away.

It’s understandable that local taxi services are upset by Uber’s competitive edge. After all, in the age of smartphones, why not just ping some guy and ride in his car for a fraction of the cost of a registered taxi? When bureaucrats meddle with the market in order to protect outdated industries, they hurt customers and discourage innovation. Like it or not, creative destruction is the key to the free market.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Corlyss

    How much do those taxi licenses pay to the govt?
    European policy makers hate free markets. D*a*m*n good thing the middle ages and the age of exploration are not happening now.

  • free_agent

    I gather that in Boston, at least, Uber is not cheaper than official taxi rate. Which is rather surprising really. Nonetheless the taxis hate them anyway. I’ve never seen an explanation of what the taxis’ complaint is, though. I suspect that when taxis are in shortage (at bar-closing time), there are opportunities to make extra money above the meter rate, and Uber undercuts that.

  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    Guilds are always a bad deal for the consumer, Quality, Service, and Price all suffer when Guilds have a monopoly.

    • Corlyss

      You don’t understand. The European consumer is happy with these Guild deals because the government has told the consumer he’s happy with these Guild deals. If the consumer weren’t happy, the government would simply ignore him because the government does what’s best for everyone. 😉

  • Breif2

    “rules that force limousine drivers to return to their base after delivering customers”

    What? But this is very un-green! Next thing you know, they’ll close down carbon-neutral nuclear plants and burn dirty coal instead! Why do Germans hate the environment?

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service