mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
ACA Agonistes
Jindal Nudges Repeal-Only Party Toward Reform

Obamacare supporters may be too busy celebrating the seven million enrollment number to have noticed, but Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal has released a plan to repeal and replace the law. Jindal’s plan doesn’t aim for universal coverage, which distinguishes it from some plans supported by some conservative wonks, but rather to reduce costs first and foremost. As Wonkblog explains, Jindal’s vision blends standard Republican health care ideas with others that have a bit more bipartisan support. Core provisions include block-granting money to the states to run their own Medicaid programs, extending the tax deduction employers get to all individuals, and premium support, which would give elderly Americans a subsidy to buy coverage from private insurers.

Jindal’s is the second major ACA replacement idea we’ve seen, after the one advanced by Senators Tom Coburn, Orrin Hatch, and Richard Burr. Both show that at least some in the GOP realize that their party cannot just coast to victory on a “repeal Obamacare” platform. The proposals come not a moment to soon, as Ross Douthat points out:

We do know that there won’t be an immediate political unraveling, and that we aren’t headed for the kind of extremely-low-enrollment scenario that seemed conceivable just a few months ago, or the possible world where cancellations had ended up outstripping enrollment, creating a net decline in the number of insured. And knowing that much has significant implications for our politics. It means that the kind of welfare-state embedding described above is taking place on a significant scale, that a large constituency will be served by Obamacare (through Medicaid as well as the exchanges) in 2016 and beyond, and that any kind of conservative alternative will have to confront the reality that the kind of tinkering-around-the-edges alternatives to Obamacare that many Republicans have supported to date would end up stripping coverage from millions of newly-insured Americans.

The longer Obamacare is in place, the more important it will be for Republicans to coalesce around a compelling alternative to the ACA. With two plans out there now, the GOP is still in the very beginning stages of the kind of policy ferment that could lead to that kind of consensus. But the sooner it gets there, the better it will do.

Features Icon
show comments
  • ojfl

    I take exception with the characterization of the GOP with the repeal only label. They have always had ideas and put them on the table but never saw the coverage.

    • Jim__L

      Mostly, this article nudges VM’s coverage towards honesty.

      It’s not quite there yet, as the title implies that ObamaCare should be allowed to stand.

      • Andrew Allison

        You mean you’re not in favor of having we geezers (and other taxpayers) subsidize your children’s healthcare insurance? Just kidding!

        • Jim__L

          There’s no one subsidizing my children’s health insurance but me and my wife, and no one asking anyone else to.

          Being left alone to spend the money we earn as we see fit would be nice, though.

  • Andrew Allison

    I take exception to “enrollment”. I predict that about 75% of those supposedly “enrolled” will actually pay a premium. As to the question of fix-or-repeal, my own opinion is that it’s so totally FUBAR that repeal with protection for those already ensnared is the best approach.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service