mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Restive Region
Jordan Feels the Heat From the Syrian Fire

As leaders meet in Geneva to discuss Syria’s fate, let’s remember whose bearing a large brunt of the Syrian blowback, and what this may mean for regional stability. Jordan holds over half a million of its troubled neighbor’s refugees, a population surge that cost the desert kingdom $1.7 billion this past year. The UN predicts another $2.8 billion will be spent on hosting the Syrians in 2014. A stagnating economy, societal turmoil, and a growing variety of dubious characters stirring up trouble in-country has the ruling monarchy under considerable stress. Jordan has been a reliable ally in a volatile region, and it should be troubling to the US that the Syria conflict is beginning to spread there. As former AI contribuor Kori Schake argues for the FP, America could do well to give more attention to Jordan:

And here is where the Obama administration could perhaps make a virtue out of the catastrophe that is its Middle East policy, harnessing the newfound willingness of unlikely partners in the region to productive effect. The U.S. government should develop a strategy for raising not just that $3.2 billion but also providing political, economic, and other assistance to the government of Jordan, webbing it into regional cooperation made possible by allies worried about U.S. policies…the cost of stabilizing Jordan is nowhere near the cost we will pay if King Abdullah II is unable to hold the country steady and maintain its current policies.

Jordan is a valuable American ally in more ways than one. The Abdullah II regime is friendly to US regional interests, and represents a moderate, progressive alternative to the Islamist groups that have seen their stock rise in the region. As Schake makes clear, resource-strapped Jordan is in trouble. Increased assistance to the Kingdom would go a long way in reassuring the Hashemite King of America’s commitment to his country’s stability, and could help keep the Syrian unrest from further destabilizing yet another country in an already restive region.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Michael Ferrin

    Attn copy editor: In first sentence, change “whose” to “who’s”.

    • Corlyss

      Editing on this site among the “professionals” is about as sorry as it is in the publishing industry. If spell-check don’t pick it up, forget it.

  • lukelea

    Actually I can think of few things more promising than Jordan splitting in two in a civil war, with the Palestinians getting the Western half. Then (and only then?) we might see some progress in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Lebensraum is not to be pooh-poohed necessarily. I know this is a terrible thing to say. But mightn’t it be true?

    • Corlyss

      Probably true. I hate to see Iran and Al Qaeda swarm the place like they will.

  • Corlyss

    I’ve been waiting for the Jordan shoe to drop in all this. In the current atmosphere of hysterical, wailing emotion about how refugee concerns are paramount to all others, including national stability, I’m not sure it could get away with expelling the Syrians like they did the Palestinians in the 70s. In the good ol’ days, massive immigration like Jordan and Lebanon experience used to be a casus bellae. These days, the attitude is completely in favor of the immigrants. The destabilization seems to matter not at all to the international community, i.e., the conscience of the world. (gag).

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service