mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The Syria Nightmare
Rebel Commander Flees Islamists

The top Western-supported rebel commander in Syria has been run out of town by Islamist fighters in the latest setback to US policy in the Syrian civil war. General Salam Idris, the commander of the Free Syrian Army, was forced to flee to Turkey after fighters belonging to the Islamic Front overran his offices and took control of warehouses that stored gear sent by the US to help Idris and his men fight the Assad regime. Idris’ flight coincides with the US announcement that it was suspending the non-lethal aid it had been supplying to rebel forces due to fears it was falling into the hands of al Qaeda-allied groups. The WSJ has more on the story:

The takeover and flight of Gen. Salim Idris of the Free Syrian Army shocked the U.S., which along with Britain immediately froze delivery of nonlethal military aid to rebels in northern Syria….

The Front took over the warehouses and offices controlled by the Supreme Military Council, the moderate opposition umbrella group that includes the FSA and coordinates U.S. aid distribution, officials said. They also seized the Bab al-Hawa border crossing with Turkey, near the warehouses in the town of Atmeh.

If anybody was wondering what an ignominious policy failure looks like, this latest development in Syria provides a textbook case. The Islamist rebels are losing to the Iran-enabled forces of a blood-stained tyrant who has lived to laugh at President Obama’s warnings about chemical weapons and his threats to use force if his red lines were crossed. Those rebels are, however, still strong enough to crush naïve forces who thought that support from Washington could help them.

In Syria today, the US has no allies, no policy and no options. If the President’s drive to a nuclear deal with Iran fails, it will in large part be due to the way that his Syria policy undermined his standing in the region and damaged his credibility.

We are asked to believe that this is “smart diplomacy” at work. If only there were a way to agree.

Features Icon
show comments
  • qet

    Gee, didn’t see that coming. As I have said before, for the foreseeable future, in the Middle East the secular or moderate forces will always lose out to the Islamist forces. Always.

  • Fat_Man

    How can you say this is “the latest setback to US policy in the Syrian civil war” when there is absolutely no indication that the US has a policy. Yes, individuals in the US government, even the President, have expressed wishes. But do wishes make a policy. I don’t think so. I think a policy requires objectives and actions designed to obtain that objective. The US has not gotten close to taking actions.

    • B-Sabre

      The word “goals” or maybe more accurately “wishes” is probably better, Because you are right. People in DC seem to think having a wishlist of things they want is the same as a strategy or policy. But it ain’t.
      You can put that pony on your list to Santa, but that ain’t going to put one under the tree.

  • gabrielsyme

    Mind-boggling incompetence. Could a worse course of action have been taken?

  • TommyTwo

    “The takeover and flight of Gen. Salim Idris of the Free Syrian Army shocked the U.S.”

    I too was shocked at how Idris was unable to beat back the Islamic Front forces despite all the “nonlethal military aid” we gave him. I suppose I should have seen this coming; despite repeated instruction, he never quite got the hang of threading a flower down an opponent’s rifle barrel. Indeed, he didn’t even seem to understand the point! Bungler.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service