mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Libya Is the New Mali


“It seems we must make a special effort on southern Libya,” said France’s Foreign Minister on a recent trip to the new focal point of the global war on terror: Africa. Libya is the “new Mali,” Reuters reports. (Wasn’t Mali the “new Libya” not all that long ago?)

“The south of Libya is what the north of Mali was like before,” an unnamed advisor to Mali’s interim President Dioncounda Traore told David Lewis of Reuters. Reading his dispatch from Bamoko makes one wonder what sort of plan the Obama administration had for post-Qaddafi Libya, if any.

The overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 flooded the Sahara with pillaged weapons and ammunition. Tuareg separatists used them to seize power in northern Mali, only to be ousted by even better-armed Islamists who set up training camps and imposed harsh Islamic law until the French forces arrived.

The Islamists have also exploited Libya’s weakness. Veteran al Qaeda commander Moktar Belmokhtar bought weapons there after Gaddafi’s fall and his fighters passed through southern Libya to carry out a mass hostage-taking at an Algerian gas plant in January, in which 37 foreigners died. […]

With no effective national army, Libya relies on local brigades to police its southern border region where at least 100 people died in ethnic violence last year. Tripoli’s failure to restore security there may be encouraging permanent Islamist camps and weapons stores, security officials say.

It isn’t just Libya. The whole Sahel region has “become an attractive foothold for insurgents,” Ghana’s President John Dramani Mahama told the BBC this week. Meanwhile, a huge cache of weapons, suspected of belonging to Hezbollah operatives, was discovered in Nigeria yesterday. “The arms and ammunition were targeted at facilities of Israel and Western interest in Nigeria,” reads the military’s official statement. Weak states, porous borders, no police, easy access to weapons—no wonder this region is highly attractive to Islamic militants and criminals of all kinds.

President Obama can give as many speeches as he wants about closing the book on the global war on terror, but this conflict is not yet done with him or us.

[Muslim militant image courtesy of Shutterstock]

Features Icon
show comments
  • Luke Lea

    It appears that tribal and clan-based societies can only be held together by tyrants. Are there any exceptions?

  • ljgude

    As I have said before a friend of mine was working happily away for years doing exploration in southern Libya for a Houston oil company. Kadafi had been defanged and was doing good business. Now we have chaos and no oil. What were they thinking? How could Obama after seeing the unintended consequences of Bush’s overly optimistic intervention in Iraq think he could avoid unintended consequences with an at least equally idealistic agenda? Did the Euros think they could get a better deal with Kadafi gone? Now no one is doing any exploration because it is too dangerous. If they want to spread democracy or ‘dutifully’ protect somebody why don’t they go and knock over some non Muslim tyranny like…say…Zimbabwe! Oh, right, that would be colonialism and beside would displease the Chinese who are busy colonizing Zimbabwe even as we speak.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service