Foreign Fracking
Water Scarcity Stymies Shale Ambitions Abroad
show comments
  • Pete

    God has blessed America from the start.

  • CaliforniaStark

    The technology presently exists to frack without water. Wells are now being fracked with propane gel, and advances are being made in developing cryogenic fracking with liquid nitrogen, and fracking with CO2. Major corporations such as GE and Halliburton are now involved with developing waterless fracking.

    The problem with fracking in China more involves the lack of protection of intellectual property rights than new fracking technology. Unfortunately, China’s poor reputation in this regard has proceeded them. You reap what you sow.

    • Kevin

      Yes. I was going to suggest that ingenuity and legal structure probably matter more. These can help overcome other limitations by encouraging the hunt for substitutes. But with them even a natural abundance will be squandered.

    • Jacksonian_Libertarian

      It isn’t just the proprietary technical knowledge that is holding places like China back, it is also the real property rights. Nearly all of the fracked wells are on private land in the US. In most countries property owners don’t have the mineral rights to their own land. This is a major roadblock to development, as dealing with governments is an exercise in corruption, red tape, and nationalization (theft of your property and profits). So at the moment, and for as long as there’s places to develop in the US, drillers are going to stay in the US where there is much less risk, and much higher long term profits.
      This blog frequently touts the Mexican reform of their nationalized oil industry PEMEX, and I have repeatedly commented that the baby steps they are taking are much too small to encourage the kind of development this blog thinks it will. PEMEX’s problems are those of a monopoly and as long as it remains a monopoly it will continue to decay. Monopolies including the Government Monopoly all suffer from the same disease, they lack the “Feedback of Competition”. It is the “Feedback of Competition” that forces continuous improvements in Quality, Service, and Price, in free markets. Any organization that isn’t challenged by competitors, doesn’t get the information needed to know what changes are needed, and to force those changes to occur in the face of the human resistance to all change.

  • Boritz

    Texas has historically suffered from a similar problem. A rancher in dire need of water for his cattle herds would sink another well only to find that it too would only produce oil…

  • Fat_Man

    I have frequently tried to remind you that FT articles are paywalled. However, if you google the title of the article, it will be the first entry. You may then read the article by answering a couple of inane questions.

    Please, give the full title of any FT article you are linking.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.