Birth Rate Blues
Chinese Say Thanks But No Thanks to Two-Child Option
show comments
  • lukelea

    As you can see there is no problem for replacement levels in some parts of the world:

  • gabrielsyme

    Forty years of indoctrination and coercion have changed the culture. At least Russia did not have to fight against it’s own anti-natalist propaganda. I imagine the urban Chinese population will never recover any significant part of its lost fertility; China will have to see a fairly massive increase in the impoverished rural areas if it is to avoid long-term well-below-replacement fertility overall.

    The one-child policy was an enormous evil, that resulted in tens of millions of abortions, many of them forced, forced sterilisations, and the abandonment of untold numbers of illegal children. It should not be a great surprise that China will suffer on account of it.

  • FriendlyGoat

    Does a country the size of the USA with four times as many people really need to be running at full replacement rate?

    • Honk

      It is not the size, but the demographic composition of the population, with respect to the workforce.

    • Guest

      [deleted by me]

      • FriendlyGoat


    • Stephen W. Houghton

      Yes, because otherwise they are going to have lots of old people for few workers.

  • Jane the Actuary

    This is interesting, but not that surprising. In the U.S., we tend to think of a two-child family as “natural” so that when a country’s birth rate drops, it’ll settle there. But there’s nothing natural about it — if a culture becomes accustomed to a one-child norm, if all your friends and relations have one child, why should you deviate? That’s what’s happened in Germany, anyway.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.