ACA Agonistes
A Bird’s Eye View of the ACA
show comments
  • Boritz

    “…lists like Cowen’s will be incredibly helpful in focusing the debate around a stable set of metrics.”

    Add the number of people who won’t be exposed to data and the number who don’t care what the data says and you have an electoral majority, but it was a nice idea that would have had some appeal for an earlier generation.

  • qet

    No list of metrics is going to do any grounding of any debate. The metrics we have already show that the subsidies necessary to pay for people’s ACA-acquired insurance are busy entrenching themselves as just another entitlement program and that the cost curve will be “bent” only by government curtailment of allowed providers and services. The complexity of the ACA ensures that at no time will the Left not be able to trot out a mouthpiece like Krugman or his ilk to claim how successful the ACA has been. The ACA is designed so that its true effects will be unknowable according to the standards of low-IQ obviousness that would sway even liberals to acknowledge what a disaster it is and will be.

  • FriendlyGoat

    The Republicans since 2009 have recommended nothing whatsoever but mumbled phrases about (unspecified) tort reforms and a wish to sell (unspecified) insurance across state lines. The only debate worth having about the ACA is with those who offer better ideas——fleshed out with detail.

    Everything else is fruitless bitching.

    • qet

      That’s because there is no better idea. And that is because this problem is not a problem of ideas. It is a problem of simple arithmetic. Prices are a function of supply and demand, and the supply is relatively inelastic to the demand. There are high barriers to entry on the supply side. All the Econ 101 things you know and a bunch of Econ 102 things as well. So there are only two options. (1) treat it like social security and pay people a fixed amount, an amount we can afford. it may not cover all of their medical costs, like social security may not cover all of your living expenses. But hey, it’s something, right? (2) practice what you preach. Right now the Left is preaching health care uber alles. So prioritize it. Draw in funds from all the other federal spending programs. Reduce Medicare spending and even social security spending to fund ACA payments. Reduce military spending. Get rid of the Dept. of Education and stop all education payments. And so on. The money is there, if health care is really the priority people say it is. But of course that will never happen. Only about 10 people in this country would support the ACA if told that the money to pay for it would have to be reallocated from other spending programs.

      There is a third option. Gather every aspect of health care under federal government operation and control. Then put out propaganda, I mean data, that proves that our health care is now the best ever in the entire history of the universe. Krugman, Klein & Co. can be counted on to mindlessly propagate the message. If we all believe we have a great health care system, then we do have a great health care system. Q.E.D.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.