Winter for Higher-Ed
Do Liberal Arts Grads Really Make More Than Their Peers?
show comments
  • Anthony

    “The career world is like an ecological system: people occupy particular fields within which they must compete for resources and survival.” Now, one question becomes are liberal arts degrees gateway to finding niche in the ecology that a grad can dominate (does it complement idea that you cannot have everything in the present). Secondarily, a companion question would be will liberal arts degree enhance grad’s learning opportunities. To this end, a third question becomes in this new age are liberal arts degrees compatible to expanding possibilities as grads get older. If answers are in affirmative, then hopefully, and taking cue from WRM, the programs will become more efficacious.

  • Andrew Allison

    Ah, yes. The Association of American Colleges and Universities is a clearly impartial commentator on the higher ed racket! Worse yet, neither of the quotes make anyy no reference to the relative earning of liberal arts majors versus, e.g. STEM, which make the headline completely irrelevant.

  • TommyTwo

    “liberal arts majors might actually be better off than many of their peers. Although they may earn less in the years immediately following graduation, Inside Higher Ed points out, liberal arts majors win out in the long run”

    To resort to the usual stereotypes*, this spin (which I will politely blame on the link) must have been written by a liberal arts major who is either deficient in logic or excessively proficient in demagoguery. What the study shows is that the liberal arts graduates (with all of the caveats noted here) eventually, towards the end, earn a higher annual salary. But unlike the strong impression this summary leaves, they never overcome the lifetime earnings advantage of other graduates. Aesop, anyone?

    * A college student is in a Boston-area store doing his weekly groceries. He goes to the express “10 items or less” check-out counter and proceeds to unload 20 items. The cashier glares at him and asks: “Are you an MIT student who can’t read or a Harvard student who can’t count?”

    • Andrew Allison

      *Neither, he’s a member of the elite, who believes that rules are for lesser beings.

      • TommyTwo

        So a Harvard student then. 🙂

        • Andrew Allison

          Of course (MIT students are also elite, but are naturally more inclined to follow the rules)!

  • Pete

    The liberal arts degree of yesteryear had a great deal more heft than today’s, don’t you think?

  • free_agent

    There is also evidence that college students these days are spending less time studying than college students of 50 years ago, which might also dilute the value of today’s degrees:

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w15954.pdf

    The Falling Time Cost of College: Evidence from Half a Century of Time Use Data
    Philip S. Babcock and Mindy Marks
    NBER Working Paper No. 15954
    April 2010

  • Fat_Man

    The validity of these studies leaves a great deal to be desired. What happened to the boomer generation is not necessarily what will happen to the millennials. Their lives are already different than the boomers lives were in the 60s and 70s and their paths will continue to diverge.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.