American Boys Falling Behind Foreign Competition
show comments
  • The Raving Jock

    Very interesting; here in the UK, the introduction of a new top-level grade has helped males: they dominate the top grades in the more rigorous subjects like mathematics, physics, chemistry and economics. However, the introduction of the new grading was not in response to the problem of male underachievement, it was rather in response to grade inflation whih brings me to my next point.
    The watering down of course content fails to challenge the very top (of which boys are disproportionately represented) which can lead to lower levels of engagement.
    The solution, I believe, would be to ensure that high school is a far more challenging environment which leads to a clearer seperation of abilities but sadly the prevailing dogma (in both politics and teaching) is that ‘no child can be left behind’ which leads to a one-size-fits-all education which ends up watering down the curriculum. This, and a failure to demonstrate lessons in a more applied empirical context, has lead to relatively greater level of detachment in boys.
    Even in younger age groups where university-educated females outnumber their male counterparts, it is still male innovation which continues to push the boundaries of economic growth. That, in itself, is a strong enough reason to introduce the changes necessary to address the gap.

    • Fred

      Boy are you right. Unfortunately, in America your attitude would be labeled as “elitism” i.e., the moron’s race card.

    • Corlyss

      “The watering down of course content fails to challenge the very top”
      No question you’re right.

      Unfortunately, the object of the school system today is to foster social goals, not really to educate. The old way was rote, discipline, and testing for verification. All that’s been discredited as “creating winners and losers, which leads to self-esteem problems for the less adept (losers).” So now we have a system where everyone is a loser, everyone is taught to feel good about him or herself regardless of whether there’s any reason to, and we graduate generations of touchy-feely citizens who feel others’ pain, want to be nice, helpful, and uncritical (because criticality underscores differences and observation of differences can be painful to others), wouldn’t think of distinguishing themselves from their peers, and can’t find their bums with both hands. I wouldn’t give you a nickel for the average graduate of high school today.

  • Anthony

    The above is a very important issue and at least 20 years old if not more. Issue also now is mixed with intellectual mobility constraints of economy (the skill of being able to learn new skills as the occasion demands). U.S. boys are definitely being short changed in the information age (where all purpose skills that depend on language mastery are rewarded yet teaching methods are leaving many behind). The answers are not only vocational-technical schools but perhaps rethinking both pedagogical and curriculum systems beginning at K-8 on through 9-12.

  • Corlyss

    When I was in public school, there were already too many women in education. It’s become one of those nurturing professions “suitable for women.” The profession, which now deals with much younger kids than was typical when I entered the system, is estrogen-besotted. Women and men think and communicate differently. With the raising of women’s consciousness in the 60s and 70s about the evils of patriarchy, women tend to think boys and men would be much much better if they were remade everso slightly in women’s more feminine and collegial kumbya-singing everybody-join-hands image. A good move might be to get more men in the profession. I don’t see it happening tho’.

    • Kavanna

      The joke is the idea that there’s any patriarchy to fight.

      Patriarchy — kings, popes, bishops, dukes and lords, powerful patres familias — has been dying in the West for centuries — really, since the Reformation. In the US, patriarchy has been no more than residual since around the time of World War One, when women obtained the vote.

      For the last 40 years or so, we’ve been under the sway of leftist feminism, with its ritual incantations of victimhood and oppression. While the patriarchy they think they’re fighting is imaginary, they have done much damage to equal relationships between men and women.

      Whoever thought that in 2013, life in America would be subject to such PC thought control and denial?

      • Corlyss

        “The joke is the idea that there’s any patriarchy to fight.”

        Excellent point. They wouldn’t be the left if they weren’t flogging 200 year old bêtes noires that long ago ceased to be issues. I mean, look at the union movement, an anachronistic bunch of whiners if ever there was one. They’re all still trying to fix problems of the 1840s. The only thing that gives their lives meaning and justification.

  • Fat_Man

    When my son turned 5 (he is 26 now) we went to sign him up for a soccer team. We found out that there girls team and co-ed teams. Clearly boys teams are sexist. Face-palm.

    • Anthony

      Wow, I’m pretty liberal, and from my vantage point, it’s pretty obvious that single gender sports leagues are a very bad idea.

  • Anthony

    I think single gender classrooms might be a possible remedy. Male teachers, moreover, are in a better position to control rowdy boys. When I was in school, I always liked the fact that most of the male teachers I had were better at controlling students, gasp… even better at controlling me. If I acted up, they tended to come down hard, but unlike many of the female teachers – who tended to take it personally and would sometimes be angry for an entire day – they wouldn’t stay angry for very long provided that I continued to behave.

    Single gender classrooms might be helpful in light of the fact that a lot of bad behavior, especially in the middle and early high schools years, comes from a desire to impress members of the opposite sex.

    I went to what most people would call a good suburban high school, and I can say without a doubt that at LEAST half of my time there was wasted. The amount of worksheets – i.e., fill in the the blank – that we had to do was staggering and pathetic. These kinds of activities are more akin to incarceration than education. Professor Mead is spot on when he says that there needs to be a way for students who have mastered the material to get out of school more quickly.

  • Anthony

    Actively look for ways to solve problem – culturally in America families, neighborhoods, communities, etc. must make boys socio-economic concern at all levels of social organization (recreation, education, socialization, employment, and familial).

    • Jim__L

      Treating everyone as a special interest is what got us into trouble in the first place.

      Just remove the laws that hold boys back, and we’ll be fine.

      • Anthony

        Too simplistic and culturally narrow. Thanks.

        • Jim__L

          If by that you mean you’re unhappy that the approach doesn’t leave sociologists and policy wanks with much to do, that’s certainly true.

          Look on the bright side, though — you’re still welcome to spend your own time on whatever hobbies you like.

          • Anthony

            Jim, the word I presume you mean is “wonks” but none of your reply entered my initial response (which by the way remains). So, let’s end this; the wonderful thing about America is we can disagree (we have a different world view) and maintain comity I’m done.

  • Jim__L

    American society has for forty-plus years criminalized the practice of men looking after our own interests.

    Affirmative action made some degree of overshoot inevitable. Hopefully we can minimize that, by repealing those laws.

    As long as the focus of the social order is on advancing groups as groups, men should have no qualms about advancing ourselves as a group.

    The only alternative is for our social order to emphasize true equality, which sounds like a good strategy to me.

  • Kavanna

    It’s a sad truth rarely acknowledged, that other countries are reforming and advancing themselves in ways that America could once, but can no longer.

  • Jane the Actuary

    It’s sad that, in many ways, the debate treats boys’ vs. girls’ success as a zero-sum game. Who earns more? Is it “allowed” to adjust for work hours, careers chosen, etc.? Whose learning styles should the classroom favor? Or, acknowledging the 60%/40% discrepancy, does it actually impact wages on average? Any boy who isn’t living up to his potential because of the way the classroom and curriculum is structured, should be helped — as should any girl.

    More stats here: http://janetheactuary.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-future-of-boys.html

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.