NYT: Uh Oh, Benghazi Might Actually Be A Scandal
show comments
  • Boritz

    ***if the GOP had blundered this badly the media universe would be Bengazigate wall to wall. The pack would smell Pulitzers and the hunt would be on.***
    Mead occasionally makes these kinds of remarks that imply an imbalance in the media. Is Mead really saying that the media behaves in a way that favors one political party over another? I just don’t see how anyone could believe this; just as I don’t understand people who deny that the sequester will have the effect of killing all of the 99 percenters and will leave our bodies strewn on killing fields as bad as Pol Pot’s worst. I hope Mead eventually abandons his extreme position and adopts a more mainstream, moderate view like my own.

    • circleglider

      The media doesn’t favor one political party (and worldview) over another?

      Gee, then how do you explain the latest excuse: Obama Got Pass on Benghazi, Thanks to Romney? Apparently, the incompetence of the Romney presidential campaign is solely responsible for the media’s decision to ignore the Benghazi story until now.

      • The man took a courageous stand calling out the administration within hours of the event, and what did he get from our “balanced” “non-partisan” media? Scorn, ridicule, accusations of “playing politics” as if anything that dire would NOT be about politics. Sometimes the American electorate is the dumbest and most incompetent branch of system.

    • “Mead occasionally makes these kinds of remarks that imply an imbalance in the media”

      Methinks more often he makes them to put on the cloak of thoughtful evenhandedness. To me they are cloying.

      “just as I don’t understand people who deny that the sequester will have the effect of killing all of the 99 percenters and will leave our bodies strewn on killing fields as bad as Pol Pot’s worst.”
      Steady on, Boritz. Breathe deeply and don’t try to hold it. What your comment lacks in rationality and factual basis it makes up for in hysterical passion. If you can find any one who has actually suffered because of sequestration, excluding of course government workers, please post his or her photo here. Identification not necessary. The reason the Obamanoids are in such a panic over their sequestration ploy is that in truth no one has even noticed.

      • Tom

        Corlyss, I think he was being sarcastic.

        • Thanks. Sometimes hard to tell in this environ. My apologies to Boritz for misconstruing his humor.

  • Pete

    Come on!

    With anyone with eyes to see, the mainstream media has been a propaganda arm of the Democratic party for sometime now.

  • USNK2

    Waiting for someone to demand Obama start supporting free speech instead of a UN global blasphemy law: will he do-over his 09 25 2012 UN speech blaming Benghazi on that video.

  • Steve Hayes of the Weekly Standard deserves a Pulitzer for his dogged mastery of this story and his refusal to be blown off it, but of course he won’t get one. Dem Op Kristin Powers deserves kudos for her persistence in shaming the liberal media into the modest coverage they now give the story. She has done yeoman work on Bret Baier’ Special Report’s All Star Panel since the week Benghazi happened, trying to get her liberal colleagues to cover the story.

    If you enjoy watching the arrogant and artless brought low, check out the extended play of the WH news briefing Fri. If Carney were a fox, he’d be in deep trouble.

  • BrianFrankie

    >> The ugliest dimension of the story still trying to claw its way out of the Republican media ghetto is the narrative about the unseemly rush to pin the blame for the terror attack on a video, and the subsequent railroading of one of the world’s lousiest film makers into jail for essentially political reasons.<<

    This is really the scariest part of the story. A political prisoner in the US, such as we haven't seen since Wilson put a bunch of political prisoners in jail during WW1, or FDR with the Japanese citizen internment in WW2. And don't forget Secretary Clinton's statement to the family members of the slain diplomatic staff that she would make sure the filmmaker received justice. This administration has no respect for the American Constitution.

    Ugly beyond description. And on so very many levels. *Even if* the film was the proximate cause of the attack on the US facility in Benghazi, it is the duty of the US government to stand up for the right of American citizens to say what they like. Not to imprison them. You may not have to like the content of the speech, or support it in any way, but you do have to support the right of the individual to say it. Voltaire understood.

    The fact that the video causing the attack was a complete fabrication is merely adding insult to what is already a very real injury.

    The Administration modus operandi is further highlighted in the alleged retaliation against whistleblowers. The IRS Tea Party scandal also indicates the mindset. Toe the line, or we'll find something to silence you. I'm a bit afraid to post this on the VM site – will the administration try to imprison me? Fine me? Get me fired? Take other action to retaliate? There are certainly enough laws on the books, many of which contradict each other so that compliance is impossible, that no individual in the US is completely innocent – the government could trump up charges against any one it truly finds offensive. My only real protection, it seems, is that I'm not that much of a bother for them.

  • Mark Steyn pointed out that both Hillary and Obama lied over Chris Stevens coffin, declaring that his death was caused by a you tube video.

    It was at this point also, that Obama said, “The future does not belong to those who insult Islam.” in reference to Nakoula, the now jailed director of the film.

    Is it possible that W.R. Meade might write something in the future that could be said to ‘inflame’ Muslim mobs and incidentally make the Obama administration look bad?

    And if so, would he be put in jail? I can see it happening since the current administration was quite happy enough to sacrifice Chris Stevens on the altar of blaming a Youtube video. Progressives eat their own.

  • LizardLizard

    Obama is a lame duck. Mrs. Clinton is the Democrats’ shoo-in pick for President. Which one will the Party protect?

  • Really!?

    There was a stand down! Why isn’t the MSM talking about this!? It came out in congressional testimony! What happened to the weapons being stored at the embassy!? Are these the same weapons being used by ‘the rebels’ in Syria to kill civilians!? Was this Fast and Furious 2.0!?

  • Elliott Abrams, who I gather knows what he is talking about, has written that on foreign policy, Obama has kept his advisors on such a short leash that his secretaries of state or defense et al. can be given neither much credit nor blame. Since so little decision-making on foreign policy was delegated, credit or blame belongs almost entirely to Obama himself. I don’t (or course) have any inside knowledge about decisions on Benghazi, but I don’t see any reason why this particular case should be different.

    What I don’t get, even more, is why very few in the media are not demanding that America or Libya NOW pursue and punish (or kill) the people and groups responsible for the attack.

  • Kevin

    Thankfully Via Media is here to expose the backpedaling, confusion and outright lying associated with the deaths of American’s killed in a place in which no insurgency exists (at least according to the administration until recently). Wait are we talking about Libya or Iraq? Obviously should President Obama decide to surge troops to Libya to break the momentum of Ansar he will have Via Media’s full support.

  • It’s a sad day when the POTUS lies to the parents of the deceased while standing over the coffin. Pathetic.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.