mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
Islamism in Indonesia
Hardline Islamists Gain Ground in Indonesia
Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • rheddles

    Obama with a weak intellectual foundation? That’s impossible. He went to Harvard.

  • jeburke

    East is east, and west is west….

  • ——————————

    Islam is an extremely dangerous and insidious disease. It needs to be stopped in any way possible….

    • f1b0nacc1

      Please let me preface my question with the following statement….I am NOT asking this question to be snarky or to try to ‘gotcha’ you in any way. I am genuinely interested in your response. With that said…

      In an earlier exchange, you describe yourself as a libertarian with anarchist leanings (if I am misrepresenting this, please feel absolutely free to correct me). With this in mind, just how do you propose ‘stopping Islam’, if not with the full force of the nation state? Surely you do not suggest that private action would suffice?

      • ——————————

        F1b you can say and ask whatever you want. I am extremely tough to offend, so no worries. We are all here to exchange thoughts and ideas.

        Yes full force of a nation state, however I am of the mind that we could (possibly) run our military with private enterprise instead of government.
        Actually the only way to fully manage the Musloid disease is with a full-on global conflict like the Crusades…no rules of engagement and no winning hearts and minds PC BS.
        Of course that will likely never happen anytime in the next 100 years. Religious indoctrination is very hard to break. It can only be controlled at best, and only with brute force as humans have used for thousands of years…until worthless humans known as academics began to pussify the human race with over-complicated solutions to simple to solve problems.

        Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach….

      • ——————————

        You can wall them out if the left would go along with it and allow to government to do so without a protest.

        You can’t kill all, but you could beat them into submission as humans have done to each other for thousands of years. Not easy, and very bloody, but a quick solution. The fu**ing worthless academics, who have been brainwashing societies for the last few hundred years into believing we should all go against our nature as beings and just look for complicated soft solutions, or that we can all just get along, don’t realize danger of the insidious Trojan Horse that slowly letting Musloids into our countries really is.

        See my reply to f1b below.

    • FriendlyGoat

      In the 21st Century, Islam will be slowed with a messaging war or it will not be slowed at all. Your statement is correct, but you cannot kill all the Muslims and you cannot wall them out.

      • ——————————

        You can wall them out if the left would go along with it and allow to government to do so without a protest.

        You can’t kill all, but you could beat them into submission as humans have done to each other for thousands of years. Not easy, and very bloody, but a quick solution. The fu**ing worthless academics, who have been brainwashing societies for the last few hundred years into believing we should all go against our nature as beings and just look for complicated soft solutions, or that we can all just get along, don’t realize danger of the insidious Trojan Horse that slowly letting Musloids into our countries really is.

        See my reply to f1b below.

        • FriendlyGoat

          Okay, I saw your reply to f1b. I am one who believes Islam is a falsehood. I am not a fan of it in any respect. That said, we are not going to defeat it by sending private-enterprise militaries on murderous rampages. Why write comments you have to admit are not going to happen?

          • ——————————

            My private enterprise comments are about possibly privatizing our military, and was really related to a different conversation from another article.

            Actually we could whip it into submission by brute forces, like humans did to things they opposed many years ago when wars were fought to win at any cost and humans weren’t pussified by their soft technological lifestyles.
            Will that happen in the future? No one knows, so you can’t say it could never happen.

            Islam breeds best in poor and desperate countries where people are easily swayed and life is not valued like it is in the west. Those situations will always be with humanity and will always be the largest part of the global population, and that is why Islam is so insidious and can never be defeated by “messaging”.

            And until those who might oppose Islam come to grips with that simple fact, it will, over the next few hundreds of years, slowly continue to weave it’s way deeper and deeper into humanity until it is too late to stop it.

          • FriendlyGoat

            The way to defeat Islam is to get people to stop believing in it. You cannot give Muslims something better to believe by killing them. Too many people. Too many countries. Too much hatred engendered. Too much cost.

            The reason I keep talking about messaging is because Islam is a belief system, not a race or a nationality. It perpetuates on mis-education and at some point, that cycle has to be broken with other thoughts to be taught.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service