mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The Eternal Crisis
Breaking: Eurozone Still a Mess

The European Union’s finance ministers have formally stated that Spain and Portugal violated the budget deficit rules for the Eurozone in 2015. The Wall Street Journal reports:

The ministers’ decision, reached at their monthly gathering, endorses a ruling made by the European Commission—the EU’s executive arm—last week. It also marks the end of a protracted saga that has seen countless back-and-forths between Brussels, Lisbon and Madrid, triggering a broader debate across the bloc on whether the recently tightened rules can survive in times of crises.

Spain and Portugal now have 10 days to appeal the decision, and the commission has 20 days to recommend sanctions.

Tuesday’s decision marks the first time the sanctions procedure has been triggered since the rules were updated in response to the latest financial crisis.

This is how the rules were supposed to work:

The EU introduced stricter fiscal rules for countries using the euro in 2013 as a response to the sovereign-debt crisis, which had put the future of the eurozone into doubt. The main goal of the rules is to keep public debt in check.

Under these rules governments have to bring their deficits to below 3% of gross domestic product, while debts shouldn’t be higher than 60% of GDP.

And this is how they will actually work:

But top EU officials have indicated the sanctions are likely to be symbolically set at zero, in a sign that there is little appetite across the bloc to punish the two countries and amid concerns that such a move would be counterproductive at a time of economic uncertainty.[..]

The commission can impose fines of up to 0.2% of gross domestic product and must also propose that some of the EU funding committed for the countries for next year is temporarily blocked.

But it can recommend a small fine, or even no fine at all, something EU officials see as the likeliest route. It can do so either on the grounds of exceptional economic circumstances or after the countries have appealed the decision.[..]

Spanish Finance Minister Luis de Guindos said he expected the sanction to be zero, arguing it would be illogical to punish a country that has followed the policy advice of eurozone authorities in order to shift from a recession to growth.

It would be difficult for the Europeans to bring down the hammer too hard. For one thing, it’s rather hard to do that a few weeks after your President said that they would let France get away with breaking the fiscal rules “because it is France.” More seriously, the great and good of Europe are terrified of stoking any further populist backlash; in the south, fiscal leniency is popular and punishment in service of German-style restriction would stoke exactly that.

This can’t be told as a simple case of profligate southerners versus economically sound northerners: the Spanish plausibly argue that they were following the advice of leading economists to improve their economy. It’s also worth noting that the Spaniards and Portuguese have very different pleas here:

Spain has struggled to meet its budget deficit targets over the past few years despite robust economic growth. Last year, with the economy expanding 3.2%, Spain reported a budget gap of 5.1% of GDP. The commission had set a target of 4.2%.

Portugal has sharply cut its budget deficit from close to 10% of GDP in 2010 to 4.4% last year, but that still exceeded the bloc’s limit. Excluding a capital injection into a failed lender in December and smaller one-time items, Portugal’s 2015 deficit would have been slightly over the 3% limit.

Rather, what this flags up is that, nearly a decade after the euro crisis started, Europe still hasn’t figured out how to make the euro work as a cohesive currency. Despite the happy talk about how the Germans are more tolerant of European Central Bank measures these days, it’s still run more or less as if it were the Deutschmark, but distributed to nations that need the lira. Fiscal transfers are still a distant dream, and as this story shows, so is fiscal discipline. And so, unable to go forward but unable to back out, the eurozone will limp on until the next crisis.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Fat_Man

    And how stupid are the Brits for wanting out?

  • Pete

    The British never bought into the euro.

    But you’re right, getting out of te EU was the smart thing for the UK do.

  • Boritz

    The sequel is better:
    Breakin’ 2: Electric Boogaloo

  • gabrielsyme

    There is a close parallel between the way elite institutions and elite opinion almost unanimously favoured introducing the Euro and the way the same institutions and opinion almost unanimously favoured Britain remaining in the European Union. Given the profound failure to grasp the consequences of the Euro, perhaps it is wise to look at elite opinion being formed not on the basis of competency or particular expertise, but rather on the basis of ideological and structural features of their class and institutions.

    “Put not your trust in princes”, wrote the psalmist – and it would be wise to heed these words ever more today in respect of the entrenched elite opinion-makers and power-brokers of our Western societies.

  • Josephbleau

    I love the argument of the Spaniards, “Since I followed the direction of leading Economists, I am blameless for actual results.” Ho Ho Ho.

  • PierrePendre

    Europe still hasn’t figured out how to make the euro work as a cohesive currency.

    __________________________________

    On the contrary , Europe’s leaders always knew that the solution was economic and political union (with a pan-EU economics and finance ministry in Brussels) but when the euro was created at Maastricht, there was no appetite for the surrender of that amount of national sovereignty. The Commission counted on an eventual euro crisis stampeding the EZ countries into compliance. When the crisis arrived in 2008, it didn’t work out according to the blueprint. The Commission is now held in widespread suspicion over a number of issues, not just its mismanagement of the euro, exacerbated by Brexit which at bottom was prompted by the sovereignty issue. Nationalism is one the rise around the EU with the emergence of political parties like Germany’s AfD and France’s FN and some central European countries are in open rebellion against migrant quotas and the Commission’s meddling in internal politics. All of the reasons for the euro crisis, unmanageable debt and excessive government spending, have survived eight years of mend and make do policies from Brussels. Economic and political union is as far away as possible and without it, the euro is at some point doomed. This reality is behind the Europhiles’ desperate calls for “more Europe” in response to each successive crisis, including Brexit, which fall on increasingly deaf ears. More Europe is a euphemism for economic and political union.The Commission theoretically can punish Spain and Portugal for their transgressions but to do so they will need a convincing explanation for the forgiveness of France and Germany for the same sins.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service