mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Gender Matters
Poverty Hits Boys Hardest

Most of our society’s discourse on gender inequality in our society is focused on the very top: The fact that men outnumber women in elite boardrooms, law firms, and college faculty lounges. But at the middle and bottom of society, the gender inequality vectors look very different, with boys on the losing end. From the abstract of a new NBER paper:

Relative to their sisters, boys born to disadvantaged families have higher rates of disciplinary problems, lower achievement scores, and fewer high-school completions. Evidence supports that this is a causal effect of the post-natal environment; family disadvantage is unrelated to the gender gap in neonatal health. We conclude that the gender gap among black children is larger than among white children in substantial part because black children are raised in more disadvantaged families.

The authors offer two explanations for why social disadvantage seems to harm boys more than their sisters. First, it may be that “parental investments in boys versus girls differ systematically according to family disadvantage.” For example, children born into low-income families are more likely to be raised without fathers, and the absence of a male role model might be especially harmful to boys’ development.

The second explanation is that “low quality schools are particularly disadvantageous for boys.” It may be that while girls are academically independent and self-directed, boys’ well-being depends more on having strong outside support structures.

The results of the study remind us that some of our 20th century styles of thinking about gender and privilege are in need of an update. Sometimes, 20th-century thinking has gotten in the way of important initiatives that could help disadvantaged men. For example, the ACLU and other liberal advocacy groups have waged a long-running crusade against single-sex education targeted at low-income men of color, on the grounds that such programs are unfair to girls. Needless to say, that is the wrong approach. Both boys and girls have distinct institutional advantages and vulnerabilities, and it’s important that our public institutions do what they can to prevent children of either gender from being left behind.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • M Snow

    Might be interesting to separate poor boys and poor boys without fathers in the home to see how the two groups compare.

  • Jacksonian_Libertarian

    “For example, children born into low-income families are more likely to be raised without fathers, and the absence of a male role model might be especially harmful to boys’ development.”

    The Great Society Welfare program is destroying America. You get more of what you pay for, and since America pays for women with dependent children, America gets more of these broken homes, and hence more broken children. This is child abuse, mothers who do this to their children are guilty of child abuse. Studies prove that orphans, and single father raised children are on a par with nuclear family raised children, only female raised children suffer this truncated development.

    • Jim__L

      Feminism has at this point left more children fatherless than War.

  • Andrew Allison

    Cliff Notes version: Boys need more help than girls to get a (non-pretend) secondary education, and hence a decent job.
    What hath the feministas wrought?

    • Jim__L

      Boys need a different kind of help than our schools are giving them, to stick with secondary education and get the most out of it.

      Bring back competition with real prizes, bring back recess, bring back hands-on education, bring back male-only schools. Boys used to do better; education has changed for the worse, from boys’ perspective.

  • http://clevelandclinic.academia.edu/JedAdamGross Jed AG

    The notion of a “glass ceiling” is frequently invoked in public discussion of inequality and mobility. If this concept is useful, perhaps it should be coupled with the notion of a “glass basement.”

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service