mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn bayles
Flint water crisis
When Pensions Crowd Out Infrastructure

The enterprising blogger Greg Branch has an interesting explainer on the origins of the Flint water crisis that doubles as a rebuttal to those (mostly on the left) who are trying to turn it into a crude bludgeon against their political opponents. As Branch explains, the disaster was caused by a cascade of failures at multiple levels, implicating people in both parties as well as non-partisan bureaucrats. One passage:

So Flint’s water department is asked to start treating its own water – something it hasn’t done in at least 50 years, if ever. The water guys told the mayor and Council and the EFM (by this time, Darnell Earley), “sure, we can do that.”

Apparently, they couldn’t. I’m speculating here: They had no experience in treating raw water. I don’t know if they read a book, took a seminar or watched a how-to on YouTube, but either way, they started treating the water as if it were being run through a modern distribution system of plastic and copper pipes.

It’s not. It’s running through a 100-plus-year-old system of cast iron mains and lead service lines.

The crisis may have been averted if the authorities understood the need to treat the water properly given their aging water distribution infrastructure—but it would also have been averted if that infrastructure was up to date. The reality is that revenue-hungry city governments had been systemically starving basic infrastructure maintenance for decades while scrounging every dime to meet the demands of unions, feed the greed of crooked politicians, pay exploding health care and pension costs, and fund other “urgent” priorities. As a result, little things like maintenance and upgrades for century-old water systems were apparently out of the question.

Sound principles of public finance and administration, like the laws of arithmetic and the logic of cause and effect, are neither Republican nor Democratic. And when a society like ours ignores basic principles for decade after decade, the consequences start to build up.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Jim__L

    “Sound principles of public finance and administration, like the laws of
    arithmetic and the logic of cause and effect, are neither Republican nor

    To be fair, the Republicans were far more responsive to the TEA Party than the Democrats have been.

  • Anthony

    The Flint issue certainly ought not be understood in isolation – a big canvas look must take in local/state/regional culture, politics, public opinion, social dynamics, etc. I think it is safe to say that there was “no planning ahead” – neither long-term government planning nor representative acknowledgement of changing tax/demographic conditions. Moreover, an inference from post is that we are paralyzed, not so much by blue or red disagreements, by a shared lack of serious attention to our future – we seem to drift without serious resolution to a long list of deep problems while our representatives at each election promise to reverse or improve whatever incremental steps the preceding party/administration took. Yes, the consequences start to build up.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2017 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service