mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Asian Diplomacy
Tokyo and Seoul Reach Agreement on “Comfort Women”

A huge step forward: Japan and South Korea have reached an agreement in the “comfort women” dispute, an issue no one expected them to resolve (ourselves included). The NYT:

The agreement, in which Japan made an apology and promised an $8.3 million payment, was intended to remove one of the most intractable logjams in relations between South Korea and Japan, both crucial allies to the United States. The so-called comfort women have been the most painful legacy of Japan’s colonial rule of Korea, which lasted from 1910 until Japan’s World War II defeat in 1945.

The Japanese and South Korean foreign ministers, announcing the agreement in Seoul, said each side considered it a “final and irrevocable resolution” of the issue.

The deal won praise from the governing party of President Park Geun-hye of South Korea but was immediately criticized as insufficient by some of the surviving former sex slaves as well as opposition politicians in South Korea, where anti-Japanese sentiments run deep.

This is really good news, and a big win for the Obama administration, which has been pushing Tokyo and Seoul to put this issue behind them. Finances turned out to be the smallest part of the problem: Japan’s offer of one billion yen a year is less than $10 million. The bigger obstacles were around tangled questions of honor and law: Japan doesn’t want to open the door to endless litigation and large claims for other issues related to the conduct of Japanese forces and companies during the war. South Korea, for its part, wants evidence of sincere repentance for horrific war crimes and some kind of reckoning not only for the war but for a cruel colonial occupation up until the war.

And not all of the obstacles have been completely resolved. As the quote above notes, the surviving women themselves are split on the issue, and reactions from South Korean NGOs associated with the surviving comfort women were harshly negative. Everything now depends on the ability of Korean government to sell the deal at home. It won’t be easy and the agreement may still fall apart if South Korean public opinion revolts.

Better relations between key U.S. allies is a major goal, and both negotiators and the Obama administration deserve congratulation. Moreover, the deal will be causing some unhappiness in Beijing. But this story isn’t over. If the agreement fails to win over the South Korean public, the result could be deeper estrangement between the two countries. The Japanese will resent Korea and Korean politicians will fear making any further moves toward Japan.

Features Icon
Features
show comments
  • Anthony

    “Better relations between key U.S. allies is a major goal, and both negotiators and the Obama administration deserve congratulation.”

    Well, to paraphrase WRM, good new is always welcome.

  • f1b0nacc1

    While I am delighted at the good news, I will put off my celebrations until the politicians on both sides embrace it. Anti-Japanese agitation (most of it well-deserved) is a common pastime in Korea, particularly (but not exclusively) on the Left, and this agreement offers a great opportunity for mischief.

    • Jim__L

      An interesting observation after the Virginia Tech massacre… Koreans were apparently extremely worried that there would be ethnic tensions raised because the shooter was Korean.

      That just simply never occurred to me — and apparently I wasn’t the only one. The guy was clearly a lone nutcase, not representative of his group at all. No one even had to stand up and give a grovelling apology for the sake of a person he wasn’t.

      I’m looking forward to a world where that’s the default assumption. It will be a wonderful place.

      • f1b0nacc1

        Speed that day

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service