After weeks of following the combat in Gaza, pundits are now turning to the question, “Who won?” Hamas claims points just for surviving, despite the massive hammering its leadership and its constituents endured, and some say Israel, whatever its battlefield gains, lost the “cognitive war”—big time. In the topsy-turvy universe of Middle East politics, nothing succeeds like failure on the battlefield and nothing fails like military success.Among the ancillary players, there are losers all around. Journalists’ credibility has been dangerously damaged. The UN Human Rights Council and Rights and Works Agency were embarrassingly partisan; Secretary of State Kerry and President Obama, astonishingly clueless and blundering; the intellectual Left, shamefully right-wing in its embrace of anti-Semitic discourse. Many analysts agree that Operation Protective Edge (OPE) has produced only losers and bigger losers.Yet one group did emerge from OPE a winner: European jihadis. As Israel pounded an enemy that hid behind civilians, demonstrators spilled out into the streets of Western and Muslim cities the world over to protest the “Israeli genocide of the Palestinians,” even as they shouted “Death to Jews!” and “Jews to the ovens!” and used the Twitter hashtag #Hitlerwasright. Shops were ransacked, and Jews were refused medical services and attacked in riots. Jewish businesses were boycotted. In Germany, the cry was heard: “Hamas! Hamas! Jews to the Gas!” In France, it was “Death to Jews! Slit Jews’ Throats!” While the news media downplay the violence and hatred, and the police and judiciary resist it half-heartedly, European Jews are packing their bags.So Jihadis get a quadruple win. They depict Israel as the Dajjal (Antichrist) to Western audiences; roam freely through the streets of Western cities, carrying metal bars and yelling jihadi slogans; accelerate the expulsion of Jews from Europe; and keep post-Christian Europeans thinking this violence only targets Jews, and only because of Israel. For jihadis, these past weeks confirm what they have long believed: that this is the Muslim century in which, among others, Europe joins Dar al Islam.How did this happen? How did it get so bad before we noticed it? Are we observing changes of civilizational magnitude?The story of this episode of Jew-hatred, whose rage is not yet spent, begins in 2000 and continues apace during the aughts and well into the teens. Ironically, the Palestinian asymmetrical war strategy, designed to fight Israel, turned out to be an even greater boon for global Jihad. The spectacular success of Palestinian war propaganda, delivered to the West as news by journalists, activated a violent “Muslim Street” that stormed onto the stage of European civilization.When the Palestinians started the “Al Aqsa Intifada” in late September 2000, they could count on journalists to blame Israel for the violence and present the Palestinians as hapless victims. These journalists saw their job as standing “shoulder to shoulder” with the Palestinians, or “leveling the playing field” by recycling as news Palestinian “lethal narratives” about the IDF deliberately targeting civilians, especially children. They didn’t anticipate, however, the explosive impact those lethal narratives would have on Western society, especially in Europe—the way they would systematically promote global Jihad.The most dramatic example of such lethal journalism came on September 30, 2000, when France2 aired footage (following instructions from the Palestinians) purporting to show the IDF targeting and killing a Palestinian boy who died in his father’s arms. This particular lethal narrative had an immense impact. It immediately triggered violent riots among Israeli Arabs and the murderous attacks of the Oslo Intifada among Palestinians. Osama bin Laden rapidly exploited the story to recruit for global Jihad. As war propaganda inspiring hatred of Israel, no image could compare for emotive power, a veritable icon of hatred.Stranger than the Jihadi reaction to this image but no less powerful, Europeans seized upon it as a “get-out-of-Holocaust-guilt-free” card. “This boy’s death”, opined a prominent news anchor, “erased, replaced the image of the boy in the Warsaw Ghetto.” It is hard to imagine a more staggering case of moral disorientation; dubious video footage of a boy caught in a crossfire started by his own side somehow trumps an image symbolic of the deliberate murder of a million children by the Nazis. And yet, on the wings of this secular substitution theology, Zionazism entered the public sphere: Israelis become the new Nazis, and the Palestinians the new Jews.Europeans, especially the French, reran the image repeatedly, “l’image choc” of the Intifada. But even as they did so to satisfy their own needs, they waved a flag of Jihad in front of their immigrant Muslim populations. In the first week of the violence that became known as the al Aqsa intifada, for example, Parisian “Leftists” and Muslims from the suburbs met in Place de la République to protest the murder of Muhammad al Durah. There, under a banner equating Israel to the Nazis, for the first time since the Holocaust, the cry “Death to Jews” was heard in a European capital.In the coming weeks, months and years, stoked by a constant stream of pictures and stories about Palestinian suffering, the “intifada of the suburbs” imported the violence of the Middle East to Europe, especially to the ZUS (zones urbaines sensibles), where furious and aggressive Muslims targeted a largely defenseless Jewish population. Starting quite specifically in early October 2000, the “new anti-Semitism” began to “rise from the muck” in France and throughout Europe.Subsequently, each new outbreak of violence between Israel and its most implacable Jihadi enemies—Fatah, Hamas, Hizballah, Islamic Jihad—has led to a wave of lethal journalism. That in turn has sparked widespread protests the world over, in which vituperation against Israel readily spills over into Jew-hatred. In 2002, after weeks of false but ubiquitous media reports of a massacre at Jenin, Westerners wearing mock suicide bomb-belts and carrying pictures of Sharon with a swastika on his forehead marched through the streets of Europe. In 2006, during the Lebanon war, Norwegian author Jostein Gaarder wrote a supersessionist screed against “God’s Chosen People”, and American professor Judith Butler welcomed Hizballah and Hamas into the embrace of the “global progressive left.” In 2009, during Operation Cast Lead, members of the German Die Linke party marched in a gender-segregated march, shouting Allahu Akhbar, and Death to Israel, while British protesters rallied to the cry, “We are Hamas”, and drove British police through the streets of London. And now, 2014.So rapidly and powerfully did this street presence of protesters appear that by 2003 some began to speak of the emergence in the West (especially in Europe) of a Muslim Street, possibly stronger and more intimidating than the famed and intimidating “Arab Street.” Nor was the Muslim Street limited to anti-Israel demonstrations. In February 2003, some 6–30 million people worldwide participated in protests against U.S. President George Bush’s plans to invade Iraq, described by participants as “the largest peace rally” in history.But Jihadis joined the “peace” movement and turned the demonstrations into war rallies, a development that stunned some observers into a disturbing realization. Seduced by the vision of a global progressive Left leading the world as a counterweight to American imperial hegemony, secular, anti-imperialist progressives had welcomed the support of the imperialist global Jihadis, with virulent anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism working in tandem.By the mid-aughts, the Muslim Street went solo, buoyed by its enthusiastic welcome to the “anti-war” rallies against Israel and the United States. The Ramadan Riots of November 2005 in France sparked open hostilities with a neo-tribal Jihad for control of the ZUS—no-go zones in the heart of Europe, increasingly “lost territories of the Republic.” The Danish Cartoon Scandal, ginned by radicals with a forged cartoon of Muhammad as a pig, took the globe by storm beginning in September 2005. In the London demonstration in front of the Danish Embassy in February 2006, we see for the first time the Jihadi Muslim Street formally protesting, under police protection. One man wore a fake suicide vest (only months after the London transport bombing in July 2005); speeches resounded about conquering Denmark and raping their women; and men carried signs with messages like: “Europe you will pay, your extermination is on the way”, and “Islam will dominate the world.”In hundreds of similar incidents all over Europe, the Muslim Street has grown bolder with each passing year. The anti-Jewish pogroms of 2014 represent the most openly aggressive of the manifestations of this Street in Europe today, and coincide with the most openly Jihadi discourse. “Never before,” editorialized one paper, “have the sympathizers of Islamic terror appeared so openly in Germany.” Amsterdam presided over a pro-ISIS rally, with demonstrators shouting “death to Jews!”, even as those same Jihadis slaughter infidels who refuse conversion to Islam. In Norway, Jihadis threaten their host country with “another 9/11” if they don’t create a separate Sharia-ruled section of the Oslo where Muslims need not “live with dirty beasts like you.”I suspect that these successes took most Jihadis by surprise. Only a true believer in 2000 could imagine that the West would so extensively indulge open Islamist aggression and cooperate so readily with broader Muslim demands to silence criticism. Even the most optimistic Jihadi did not expect his progressive allies—UN and human rights NGOs, post-colonial academics and journalists—to open up the gates of the global public sphere to their war narrative and to keep that invitation open so long.If few of those who indulged in Zionazi Jew-baiting realized it was not cost-free, fewer still showed awareness of the catastrophic price tag. No one dared link it to the ever more aggressive Muslim presence in the public sphere. After 9/11 European cities saw more Muslim women wearing hijab, more confrontations in children’s parks, more clashes between Jihadi discourse and the erratic objections of civil society, more Muslim public prayer that claimed main thoroughfares on Friday afternoon as temporary Sharia zones. And meanwhile, conspiracy theory, genocidal hatred, and blood libels intensified; the media’s lethal journalism fueled a grand narrative of Jihadi victory over not just the Jews, but all opponents of the true faith.The balance of cultural power shifted dramatically. Every cycle of lethal journalism provoked aggressive public protest, pushing violence to new levels. Europe’s extensive civic strength crumbled like a cultural Maginot Line: Muslim hate speech flourished, transgressing boundary after boundary with only desultory resistance. The wave of suicide bombings that began in 2001 in Israel elicited dismissive responses: “What choice do they have?” or “It’s an act of despair.” By mid-decade, the first round of books appeared warning that Europe was collapsing culturally before the onslaught.But the intelligentsia waved away such warnings as alarmist, right-wing, racist, Islamophobic war-mongering. They marginalized the voices of admonition, even as they mainstreamed the voices of Jihad. Nor was this merely an initial misjudgment, later to be corrected by acknowledgment of the realities. The Western denial and dissembling of Jihadi ideas and activities, effected by the very targets of that campaign, represents one of the more astonishing elements of this young and already momentous century.There results a cultural form of congenital analgesia, where the nerves don’t inform the brain of the body social’s pain. Agents of invasion arrive under cover of silence provided by their intended victim, even as that victim attacks those who warn it of danger. One can understand the pessimistic prognoses of close observers: this is a virulent form of auto-immune disease.Westerners have tended to think of Hamas as a regional group, a Palestinian political movement. Hamas sees itself, however, as part of a larger effort to bring the whole world into Dar al Islam. Its policy debates about a hudna with Israel pit those who want a respite to rearm against those who think that a rising Gazan death toll will further strengthen the global Jihad. The greater the suffering, the greater the inspiration to Jihadis the world over, and the more self-destructively Westerners respond.Such a sacrifice, a national martyrdom, would in their minds break down the last restraints on Jew hatred, a prelude to the messianic global Caliphate. ISIS gives us a view of the abyss. Any serious Hamas Jihadi, despite claiming to speak for the Palestinian people, would willingly sacrifice them all for the sake of the global Islamist goal.In order for this insanely destructive path to succeed, however, the news media has to continue to blame Israel and pass over in relative silence the dastardly behavior of Hamas. To stop doing so will be difficult; it means challenging Hamas intimidation, and “supporting the Israeli narrative”, apparently so dangerous a thing for journalists to do, that they have voluntarily adopted the prohibition. It also means turning off the spigot of lethal narratives about Israel, renouncing the appetite for moral Schadenfreude. As long as the West blames Israel for their suicidal and genocidal desires, these apocalyptic warriors will continue to get their own people killed (and even kill them), all for the greater glory of the global Jihad, especially in the West.This does not mean one has to adopt the Israeli narrative (there are actually many) as “true”; just that one must question the Palestinian one, and cease disseminating their malevolent war propaganda as reliable accounts in the very Western public sphere that the Jihadis target for destruction. The belief that the IDF deliberately kill children, or that Israel is a racist society, is an astonishing reversal of any fair assessment of Israel compared to other nations. It’s long past time to sober up from the moral inversion that, for the past 15 years has done so much damage to civil society worldwide.
You have read 1 out of 3 free articles this month. A quality publication is not cheap to produce.
Subscribe today and support The American Interest—only $2.99/month! Already a subscriber? Log in to make this banner go away.
Subscribe today and support The American Interest—only $2.99/month! Already a subscriber? Log in to make this banner go away.
Published on: September 4, 2014
The Middle EastThe Biggest Winner in the Lose-Lose “Operation Protective Edge”
In the topsy-turvy universe of Middle East politics, nothing succeeds like failure on the battlefield and nothing fails like military success. So who won the Gaza war?