mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
ACA Agonistes
Liberals Warm Up to ACA Mandate Repeal

Have we reached a turning point? 55 percent of U.S. voters now wish the Affordable Care Act had never passed and the 2009 system was back, according to a new Fox News poll. That’s a fairly surprising shift: Previous polls showed widespread dissent over the new law but no desire to go back to what we had before it.

In the face of intensifying opposition to the law, it’s no wonder that supporters are becoming increasingly vocal about changing it. There’s been bipartisan support for scrapping the ACA’s employer mandate for some time now, but WaPo reports that support for a repeal of the mandate is rising on the left:

“Repeal of the employer mandate might, in fact, not be such a bad idea,” Timothy Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University and vocal supporter of the Affordable Care Act, wrote this week in a column for Health Affairs. […]

The Urban Institute, a left-leaning policy research group, recently released a report concluding that nixing the mandate would “eliminate labor market distortions in law” and “lessen opposition to the law from employers” while only reducing health coverage across the country by a rather tiny 0.07 percent.

Perhaps the law’s supporters shouldn’t be so quick to call for a repeal, however. Though severing the link between insurance and employment makes good sense in an age when people change jobs frequently and quickly, repealing the mandate would likely cause considerable disruptions in the short term. It could also raise the cost of the law for the taxpayer if the people who are kicked off employer-provided plans wind up getting subsidized insurance in the ACA exchanges. So doing away with the mandate could actually increase the public’s opposition to the law, not decrease it. Either way, the calls for repealing the mandate show that we still don’t know what kind of Obamacare we will end up with. The law is already markedly different from its original incarnation; in the next few years it could change even more.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Gene

    These people couldn’t use reason to see what effects the employer mandate might have had before the damned law was passed? Yes, I know the old cliche about how you can’t reason yourself out of a position that you didn’t use reason to get into, but geez. This really ain’t rocket science, people. And I’m supposed to respect their intelligence and judgment?

    • Andrew Allison

      Per Pelosi, Congress had to pass the law to find out what was in it! And they still can’t figure out what’s in it because the Administration keeps changing it. If it weren’t so serious, it would be laughable. As it is, it’s tragic.

  • carla5731

    And what of all the people who had individual or small group insurance who were forced to comply fully with the PPACA and have been completely screwed over by the government? How will they be compensated for their losses and the fact that they were denied equal protection under the law?

  • Boritz

    “That’s a fairly surprising shift…”

    Yes. Expect frogs to now start jumping from pots of lukewarm water.

    • Dan


© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service