mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
Department of Can-Kicking
Municipalities Mortgaging Their Futures

As the rolling pensions crisis has amply shown, America’s struggling cities and states excel at nothing so much as procrastination—dithering, passing legislative half-measures—anything to avoid tackling their problems head-on. Illinois’ interminable pension reform saga is the most obvious example of this, but Springfield is hardly alone.

This week, the WSJ examines the use of “scoop and toss,” an increasingly popular delaying tactic whereby a state issues new long-term bonds to pay for bonds that are coming due, effectively taking on additional debt in return for pushing the day of reckoning into the future. The tactic has been defended as a way for governments to stretch their budgets during hard times, but in effect they appear to be effectively mortgaging their future as a way to avoid tough reforms today:

“It’s never a good sign to see this,” said John Loffredo, portfolio manager of the MainStay Tax Free Bond Fund. Mr. Loffredo said his firm recently started buying Puerto Rico bonds that carried third-party insurance guaranteeing repayment, citing the high yields. …

“The scoop-and-toss strategy might be a good strategy for a short-term solution, if you have a temporary economic recession,” he said. “But obviously, the longer it goes on, the more difficult it is to argue that it’s a good long-term solution.”

Essentially, these states are opening new credit cards to pay off debt from their old ones. From a politician’s perspective, it’s easy to see the appeal of this technique: fixing a government’s broken finances is a hard process that is bound to make you some enemies and perhaps cost you re-election; borrowing more money is easy and the time frame involved is so long that you will be long gone before the bill comes due. Unfortunately, the longer you wait, the more expensive the inevitable fixes become.

Features Icon
show comments
  • Anthony

    Scoop and toss essentially saddles post generations with accumulated debt. Concept/instrument needs more “sunlight” as many municipalities resort to its availability.

  • Bruce

    The states and municipalities have learned well from the Feds.

    • Kavanna

      Just wait til the Fed is arm-twisted into buying municipal debt.

  • AD_Rtr_OS

    CA has been doing this for years, issuing long-term debt to pay current term costs. It is not something that will end well.

  • Jim__L

    We typically spend two years out of every eight in recession.

    So, Keynsian economics might be workable (to a first approximation), if we spent two years at six percent deficits, then six years at two percent surplusses. But no one seems to ever want to run a surplus, as that would require higher taxes, lower spending, or (horror of horrors!) allowing government revenue to remain unspent.

    Politicians can’t be trusted to make Keynsianism work. State and civic debt issues need to be constitutionally tied to tax hikes or spending cuts. Federally, it is completely justified to make every Debt Ceiling vote contingent on a similar budget-balancing efforts.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service