mead cohen berger shevtsova garfinkle michta grygiel blankenhorn
The FT Warns Green Policies Hurting UK Competitiveness

shutterstock_122172184 copy

The Financial Times is urging UK politicians to use caution when crafting green policies, lest they hurt Britain’s ability to compete in a globalized economy. It’s a warning already familiar to policymakers: first movers in green policies that restrict industry or curtail growth place themselves place themselves at a disadvantage to countries—especially in the developing world—without such limits. The FT argues:

By acting alone, however, the UK risks disadvantaging itself without furthering its environmental objectives. Companies that use a lot of electricity will consider moving elsewhere. The effect on investment will be immediate even if existing plants stay put for now. This could further deplete Britain’s industrial base just as the government tries to rebalance the economy away from financial services. The danger is exacerbated by an EU carbon price that has continued to fall since the floor was first proposed. This risks becoming a “beggar thyself” policy that merely shifts emissions – and associated jobs – to other European countries and beyond.

The troubled EU scheme is itself a reminder that climate change cannot be solved by unilateral action, even by a bloc that accounts for roughly 11 per cent of global emissions. Since EU tariffs take little account of disparities in environmental regulations, the continent’s manufacturers have to compete with cheap imports from countries where dirtier production methods are allowed. Although carbon trading is being tried in places such as Australia and California, no major economy has shown much enthusiasm for European-style self-restraint.

Green policies like carbon caps are in many ways a policy luxury that only the developed world can afford, but in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, we’re seeing less support for plans that would curb growth. Without a global agreement, industries will escape onerous green legislation by outsourcing production to less restrictive countries, a predicament Germany knows well. But a global climate treaty is dead in the water, a political non-starter.

A revenue-neutral carbon tax that replaces payroll taxes and cuts corporate taxes makes a lot more sense, but the politics behind such a policy remain frustratingly broken. In the meantime, the UK would be better served going after green policies that don’t require economic asceticism: increases in energy efficiency, more telework, and homegrown shale gas, to name a few.

[Image courtesy of Shutterstock.]

Features Icon
show comments
  • Kevin

    Green policies won’t really damage the financial industry in London and the service and entertainment industries that feed off it. In this way it’s like NY. The government and press in London can’t help but absorb this ethos. If the government and press were headquartered in Manchester or even York this worldview which ignores manufacturing and production in general would be less prevalent. The very strong and centralized party model of politics and the Oxbridge background of MPs in the UK also serves to reinforce this elite worldview in UK politics and what policies are even seriously considered.

  • Corlyss

    The FT Warns Green Policies Hurting UK Competitiveness

    What? Costly dead-end technologies made competitive only by misguided public policies, draconian regulation, and ideological Utopian balderdash supported by junk science are hurting a western nation’s competitiveness?

    I’m shocked! Shocked!

    Well, really the only shocking thing about the FT’s sudden realization is that something so obvious penetrated the left-wing media noggins long enough to squeeze the story out.

© The American Interest LLC 2005-2016 About Us Masthead Submissions Advertise Customer Service